You are here:

Designing and Instructing Hybrid Open Learning Spaces Model to Support Lifelong Learning Engagement
article

, University of Houston-Clear Lake, United States

International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

With a focus upon open and lifelong learning understanding, the real world delineation between formalized higher education graduate school efforts and professional career position lines may be suggested as being blurred. This case study offers an analysis of one university instructor’s efforts towards developing hybrid learning spaces that specifically focus upon not merely knowledge acquisition but the implementation of learned information within real world professional work environments, which suggests not only the business and industry realm, but also the elementary and secondary school education environments, medical education, and higher education. The outcome of the discussion is a hybrid open learning spaces model. Through this style of instructional design at the graduate level of higher education instruction, the work place professionals become engaged and participatory within the higher education coursework environment.

Citation

Crawford, C.M. (2016). Designing and Instructing Hybrid Open Learning Spaces Model to Support Lifelong Learning Engagement. International Journal on E-Learning, 15(3), 285-312. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 6, 2024 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (2001). 7. What are the initial Standards? Retrieved on November 14, 2013, from http://www.aect.org/standards/initstand.html
  2. Association for Talent Development. (2014, August). Business acumen – in context. Talent Development, (68) 8, P. 80.
  3. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  6. Bandura, A. (1992) Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanisms. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  7. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4. New York: Academic Press, pp. 71-81.
  8. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York; Toronto: Longmans, Green.
  10. Bloom, B.S. (1984). Taxomony of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  11. Bloom, B.S., Englhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.) (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.
  12. Bloom, B.S. & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman, Green.
  13. Cerpa, N., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Some conditions under which integrated computer-based training software can facilitate learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 345-367.
  14. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
  15. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Education Psychology, 62, 233-246.
  16. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151-170.
  17. Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.
  18. The Greenleaf Center for Servant-Leadership. (1998). The Power of Servant Leadership. Ed., L.C. Spears. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership. (N.D.). What is servant leadership? Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership. Retrieved from https://greenleaf.org/ what-is-servant-leadership/
  19. Greenleaf, R.K., Spears, L.C., & Covey, S.R. (2002). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness 25th Anniversary Edition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.
  20. Jeung, H.J., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17, 329-343.
  21. Keller, J.M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26-34.
  22. Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Keller, J.M. (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance& Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
  23. Keller, J.M. (1988). Motivational design. In R. McAleese & U.C. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Educational Media Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 406-409).
  24. Norton, W., Ueltschy Murfield, M.L., & Baucus, M.S. (2014) Leader emergence: the development of a theoretical framework. Leadership& Organization Development 312 Crawford
  25. Oblinger, D.G. (2006). Learning Spaces. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved on November 15, 2013, from http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/learningspaces
  26. Seels, B. & Richey, R.C. (1994). Defining a field: A case study of the development of the 1994 Definition of Instructional Technology. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook (20), P. 2-17.
  27. Spears, L.C. (2005, August). The Understanding and Practice of Servant-Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/sl_proceedings/2005/spears_practice.pdf
  28. Stone, A.G., Russell, R.F., & Patterson, K. (2003, August). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in leader focus. Leadership& Organization Development Journal (25) 4, pp.349 – 361. Retrieved from http://colowebsite.regent.edu/Acad/global/publications/sl_proceedings/2003/stone_transformation_versus.pdf
  29. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
  30. Sweller, J. (1991). Some modern myths of cognition and instruction. In J.B. Biggs (Ed.), Teaching for Learning: The view from cognitive psychology: ACER, Radford House, Vic., Australia.
  31. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
  32. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierner,P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology; General, 119, 176192.
  33. Sweller, J., & Levine, M. (1982). Effects of sub-goal density on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 8, 463-474.
  34. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10 (3), 251-296.
  35. Swipe, J.W. & Frick, D.M. (2009). Seven Pillars of Servant Leadership: Practicing the Wisdom of Leading by Serving. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.
  36. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257-287.
  37. Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thinking and speaking. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Written 1934: Edited and translated in 1962 by Eugenia Hanfmann and Gertrude Vakar.
  38. Vygotsky, L.S. (1935). Mental development of children during education. Moscow-Leningrad: Uchpedzig.
  39. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  40. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. And Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  41. Vygotsky, L.S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.) The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
  42. Wittgenstein, L. (1960). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts