References

1. Ayersman, D. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 500-525.
2. Communications and Technology Agency. (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Coventry, UK: Author. 402
3. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1998). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Bonk, C., & Graham, C. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of blended learning environments. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
5. Clarke, C. (2004, January). Secretary of State for Education and Skills opening address. British Educational Presentation at the British Education and Training Technology Conference, Olympia. Retrieved from the Teachnet Website: http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/community/webcasts/bett2004/transcripts/clarke7jan04/
6. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, 31(5), 34-40.
7. Glassman, M. (2001). Dewy and Vygotsky: Society, experience and inquiry in education practice. Educational Researcher, 30(4), 3-14.
8. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed. Pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
9. Hedberg, J. (2006). E-learning futures? Speculations for a time yet to come. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 171-183.
10. Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213-225.
11. Jonassen, D. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Kearney, M., & Schuck, S. (2008). Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards in Australian schools. Australian Educational Computing, 8-13.
13. Kennewell, S. (2006, November). Reflections on the interactive whiteboard phenomenon: A synthesis of research from the UK. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Active Educational Researchers, Adelaide, Australia.
14. Kent, P. (2004). E-teaching and interactive whiteboards. The Richardson experience. The Practising Administrator, 26(1).
15. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
16. Levin, H. (2003). Making history come alive: Students interview Holocaust survivors on camera and publish their stories on the web. Learning and Leading with Technology, 31(3), 22-27.
17. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4)
18. Mehan, H. (1982). The structure of classroom events and their consequences for student performance. In P. Gilmore& A.A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school. (pp. 59-87). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
19. Ong, W. (2005). Ramus, method and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Papert, S. (1993). Children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic.
21. Papert, S. (2004). Technology in schools: To support the system or render it obsolete. Retrieved from the Milken Family Foundation Website: http://www.mff.org/edtech/article.taf?_function=detail & Content_uid1=106
22. Potter, J. (2005). ‘This brings back a lot of memories’: A case study in the analysis of digital video production by young learners. Education, Communication& Information, 5(1), 5-23.
23. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and development in higher education, 25, 562-567. Jamison, Australian Capital Territory: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
24. Reid, M., Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2002). Evaluation report of the Becta digital video pilot project. Coventry, UK: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
25. Rychen, D.S. (2002). Key competencies for the Knowledge Society: A contribution from the OECD project definition and selection of competencies. Stuttgart: UNESCO.
26. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1-24.
27. Schmid, E.C. (2006). Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the English language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 47-62.
28. Schuck, S., & Kearney, M. (2004). Students in the director’s seat: Teaching and learning with student-generated video. A research report. Retrieved from the University of Technology Sydney Education Website: http://www.edev.uts.edu.au/teachered/research/dvproject/pdfs/ReportWeb.pdf
29. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2007). Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards. A research report. Retrieved from the University of Technology Sydney Education Website: http://www.eddev.uts.edu.au/teachered/research/iwbproject/pdfs/iwbreportweb.pdf
30. Shewbridge, W., & Berge, Z. (2004). The role of theory and technology in learning video production: The challenge of change. International Journal on E-learning, 3(1), 31-39.