You are here:

Comparing BYOD and One-to-One Laptop Programs in Secondary School Classrooms: A Review of the Literature
PROCEEDING

, , UOIT, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-37-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) programs are becoming increasingly popular in secondary school environments (Delgado et al., 2015; Johnson et al., 2014), however, limited research has been conducted on the impact of BYOD learning environments. There has, however, been extensive research on one-to-one (OTO) programs, where schools provide devices for students to use in the classroom. This paper begins with a comparison of BYOD and OTO programs. then provides a review of the OTO literature to guide future BYOD practice and research. BYOD and OTO programs differ on at least four parameters: selection of devices, student personalization of devices, equity between students, and access to devices. It is concluded, though, that these two programs are likely similar with respect to student engagement, learning processes and learning performance. Consequently, research on OTO programs can help inform research and practice associated with BYOD programs.

Citation

Kay, R. & Schellenberg, D. (2019). Comparing BYOD and One-to-One Laptop Programs in Secondary School Classrooms: A Review of the Literature. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1862-1866). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 10, 2024 from .

© 2019 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Almasaeid, T.F. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and attitudes in teaching science among 9th grade students. European Scientific Journal, 10(31), 133-145. Retrieved from http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/4573/4370
  2. Amankwatia, T. (2008). Teaching with technology for 21st-century learning: A multiple-case study of a school district's high school laptop initiative. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (3316895)
  3. Bebell, D. (2005). Technology promoting student excellence: An investigation of the first year of 1:1 computing in New Hampshire middle schools. Retrieved from http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/researchprojects/nhLaptop/nhtpse.shtml
  4. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One-to-one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2). Retrieved from http://napoleon.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/viewFile/1607/1462
  5. Briggs, G. & Blair, E. (2014). Everyday personal laptop usage in secondary schools in Trinidad and Tobago. Education and Information Technologies. 21(3), 545–558. Doi:10.1007/s10639-014-9338-4
  6. Broussard, J., Hebert, D., Welch, B., & VanMetre, S. (2014). Teaching today for tomorrow: A case study of one high school’s 1:1 computer adoption. Delta Kappa Gama Bulletin. 80(4), 37-45. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/case-studies/96688864/teaching-today-tomorrow-case-study-one-highschools-1-1-computer-adoption
  7. Donovan, L., Green, T. & Hartley, K. (2010). An examination of one-to-one computing in the middle school: Does increased access bring about increased student engagement? Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 423-441.
  8. Dunleavy, M. & Heinecke, W. (2007). The impact of 1:1 laptop use on middle school math and science standardized test scores. Computers in the Schools. 24(3-4), 7-22. Doi:10.1300/J025v24n03_02
  9. Gurung, B., & Rutledge, D. (2014). Digital learners and the overlapping of their personal and educational digital engagement. Computers& Education, 77, 91-100. Doi10.1016/J.compedu.2014.04.012
  10. Harper, B., & Milman, N.B. (2016). One-to-one teaching in K-12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 129-142. Doi:
  11. Hatakka, M., Andersson, A., & Gronlund, A. (2012). Students’ use of one to one laptops: A capability approach analysis. Information Technology& People. 26(1), 94-112.
  12. Howard, S.K., & Rennie, E. (2013). Free for all: A case study examining implementation factors of one-to-one device programs. Computers in the Schools, 30(4), 359-377. Doi: 0.1080/07380569.2013.847316
  13. Ilomaki, L., & Rantanen, P. (2007). Intensive use of ICT in school: Developing differences in students’ ICT expertise. Computers& Education, 48(1), 119–136. Doi10.1016/J.compedu.2005.01.003Johnson,L.AdamsBecker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2014-nmc-horizon-reportk12-EN.pdf
  14. Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Education and Information Technologies, 17(2), 137–146. Doi: 0.1007/s10639-010-9150-8
  15. Keppler, K., Weiler, S.C., & Maas, D. (2014). Focused ubiquity: a purposeful approach to providing students with laptops. Educational Technology& Society, 17(4), 278-288.
  16. Lowther, D.L., Strahl, J.D., Inan, F.A., Bates, J. (2007). Freedom to Learn Program: Michigan 2005-2006 evaluation report. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy. Retrieved from http://www.memphis.edu/crep/pdfs/michighan_freedom_to_learn_laptop_program.pdf
  17. Mills, C.E. (2010). Laptop education: Impact on learning and achievement. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (3445660).
  18. Mouza, C., Cavalier, A., & Nadolny, L. (2008). Implementation and outcomes of a laptop initiative in career and technical high school education. J. Educational Computing Research, 38(4), 411-452.
  19. Niles, R. (2006). A study of the application of emerging technology: Teacher and student perceptions of the impact of one-to-one laptop computer access. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (3240350).
  20. Penuel, W.R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329-348. Doi:10.1080/15391523.2006.10782463
  21. Ross, K. (2013). Teacher implementation of “bring your own device” at a suburban high school serving high SES students. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/110360/content/Ross_asu_0010E_12753.pdf
  22. Schnellert, G., & Keengwe, J. (2012). Digital technology integration in American public schools. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(3), 36-44, doi:10.4018/jicte.2012070105
  23. Solhaug, T. (2009). Two configurations for accessing classroom computers: Differential impact on students’ critical reflections and their empowerment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 411-422. Doi:10.1111/J.13652729.2009.00318.x
  24. Spanos, D., & Sofos, A. (2015). The views and attitudes of students participating in a one-to-one laptop initiative in Greece. Education Information Technologies, 20(3), 519-535. Doi:10.1007/s10639-013-9299-z
  25. Spektor-Levy, O., & Granot-Gilat, Y. (2012). The impact of learning with laptops in 1:1 classes on the development of learning skills and information literacy among middle school students. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-SITE 2019-Las Vegas, NV, United States, March 18-22, 2019 Learning and Learning Objects, 8, 83-96. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume8/IJELLOv8p083096Spektor0807.pdf
  26. Spires, H.A., Oliver, K., & Corn, J. (2012). The new learning ecology of one-to-one computing environments: Preparing teachers for shifting dynamics and relationships. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 63-72. Doi:10.1080/21532974.2011.10784682
  27. Tallvid, M., Lundin, J., Svensson, L., & Lindström, B. (2015). Exploring the relationship between sanctioned and unsanctioned laptop use in a 1:1 classroom. Educational Technology& Society, 18(1), 237–249. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_1/20.pdf
  28. Trimmel, M. & Bachmann, J. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 151-158. Doi10.1111/J.1365-2729.2004.00076.x
  29. Weston, M.E., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about one-to-one laptop initiatives and educational change. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6). Retrieved from http://www.nationaltechcenter.org/Uploads/2010/02/The-End-of-Techno-Critique-The-Naked-Truth-about-Laptop-Init1.pdf
  30. Zuber, E.A., & Anderson, J. (2013). The initial response of secondary mathematics teachers to a one-to-one laptop program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 279-298. Doi:10.1007/s13394-012-0063-2

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts