You are here:

Designing the Online Learning Experience: A Role-Based Design Perspective
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Minnesota, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-90-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Role-based Design is a contemporary framework oriented to inspire creativity and innovation in the instructional design process, specifically by following the value-based roles of an artist, architect, engineer, and craftsperson. In this paper we provide an authentic narrative and critique of real-world design problems addressed through practical integration of the four roles and perspectives of Role-Based Design. First, we examine the design of an e-assessment environment that transforms performance evaluation in post-secondary American Sign Language education. Second, we examine the design process of a hybrid learning environment for geospatial technology integration in K-12 education. We conclude by reframing Role-Based Design as a contemporary perspective for evaluation of the design and development of future online learning environments.

Citation

Miller, C. & Hokanson, B. (2011). Designing the Online Learning Experience: A Role-Based Design Perspective. In C. Ho & M. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2011--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2031-2038). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

© 2011 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Akin Ö. & Lin C. (1995). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design Decisions. Design Studies 16(2): 211-236.
  2. Bednarz, S.W. (1999). Reaching new standards: GIS and K-12 geography. Retrieved April 10, 2001, from: http://www.odysey.maine.edu/gisweb/spatdb/gislis95/gi95006.html
  3. Collins, A., Brown, J.S. & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Dorst, K. (2008). Viewpoint: Design research: A revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design Studies 29(1) pp. 4-11.
  5. Dreyfus, H.L. & Dreyfus, S.E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.
  6. Gero, J.S. (1996). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: concepts and framework, Knowledge-Based Systems 9(7): 435-448.
  7. Gero, J.S. (2002). Computational models of creative designing based on situated cognition, in T Hewett, T. & Kavanagh, T. (eds), Creativity and Cognition 2002, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 3-10.
  8. Hokanson, B., Miller, C., Hooper, S. (2007). Commodity, firmness, and delight: Four modes of instructional design practice. In Botturi, L. & Stubbs, T. (Eds.) Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices, (pp. 1-17). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  9. Hooper, S., Miller, C., Rose, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). The effects of digital video quality on learner comprehension in an American Sign Language assessment environment. Sign Language Studies, 8(1), 42-58.
  10. Kerski, J. (1999). A nationwide analysis of the implementation of GIS in high school education. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ESRI User Conference, San Diego, California.
  11. Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Woburn: Architectural Press.
  12. Martin, R. (2007). The opposable mind. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  13. McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14(2).
  14. Miller, C., & Hooper, S. (2008). Avenue ASL: Transforming curriculum through design, theory, and innovation. TechTrends, 52(3), 27-32.
  15. Miller, C., Hooper, S., Rose, S., Montalto-Rook, M. (2008). Transforming e-assessment in American Sign Language: Pedagogical and technological enhancements in online language learning and performance assessment. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3), 155-168.
  16. Newell, W. & Caccamise, F. (1992). Sign Communication Proficiency Interview (SCPI) Manual: Rating Scale; Faribault : Minnesota Resource Center for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
  17. Visscher-Voerman, I. & Gustafson, K. (2004). Paradigms in the theory and practice of educational and training design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 69-89.
  18. Wroblewski, D.A. (1991). The construction of human-computer interfaces considered as a craft. In Karat, J. (Ed.) Taking software seriously (pp. 1-19). Boston: Academic Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts