References

1. DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Seaton, D., & Breslow, L. (2013). Diversity in MOOC students’ backgrounds and behaviors in relationship to performance in 6.002 X. In Proceedings of the Sixth Learning International Networks Consortium Conference.
2. Campbell, J., Gibbs, A.L., Najafi, H., & Severinski, C. (2014). A comparison of learner intent and behaviour in live and archived MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5)
3. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., & Seaton, D.T. (2013). Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 9(1), 13-25.
4. Carnoy, M., Jarillo Rabling, B., Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, J.M., & Sancho-Vinuesa,T. (2013). Does On-line Distance Higher Education Pay Off for Adult Learners? The Case of the Open University of Catalonia. Higher Education Quarterly, 66 (3).
5. Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennet, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E.J. (2013). The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? (November 6, 2013). Available at
   DOI> 10.2139/ssrn.2350964
6. European Commission (2010). Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
7. Setting-up a European Cross-Provider Data Collection on Open Online Courses Kalz, Kreijns, Walhout, Castaño-Munoz, Espasa and TovarEuropean Commission (2012). Rethinking education: Investing in skills for better socioeconomic outcomes. France: Strasbourg.
8. European Commission. (2013). Opening up education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new technologies and Open Educational Resources. Brussels: European Commission.
9. European Union (2015). ECTS user guide. Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/publications/2015/ects-users-guide_en.pdf
10. Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149–158.
11. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. New York: Psychology Press.
12. Gollwitzer, P.M., & Oettingen, G. (2013). Implementation intentions. In M. Gellman & J.R. Turner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 1043-1048). New York:
13. Hansen, J.D., & Reich, J. (2015, March). Socioeconomic status and MOOC enrollment: enriching demographic information with external datasets. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 59-63).
14. Ho, A., Reich, B., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013. Massachusetts: Cambridge.
15. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–160.
16. Kalz, M., & Specht, M. (2013). If MOOCS are the answer, did we ask the right questions? Implications for the design of large-scale online-courses (pp. 1–16). Maastricht. The
17. Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Kirschner, P.A., van Buuren, H., & Van Acker, F. (2013). Adopting the integrative model of behavior prediction to explain teachers’ willingness to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices: A perspective for research on teachers’ ICT usage in pedagogical practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 55–71.
18. Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A.A., & Williams, S.A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202–227.
19. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83.
20. Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). 197-213.
21. Piedra, N., Chicaiza, J., Lopez, J., & Tovar Caro, E. (2014). Supporting openness of MOOCs contents through of an OER and OCW framework based on Linked Data technologies. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1112–1117).
22. Roswell, J., & Jansen, D. (2014). The OpenupEd quality label: Benchmarks for MOOCs. International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning. 2(3). 88-100.
23. Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
24. Tempelaar, D.T., Rienties, B, Giesbers, B., & Van der Loeff, S. (2013). Cultural differences in learning dispositions. In P. Van den Bossche et al. (eds.), Facilitating Learning in the 21st Century: Leading 3 through Technology, Diversity and Authenticity, 5, Netherlands: Springer. DOI10.1007/978-94-007-6137-7_1This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Cited By

• Setting-up a European Cross-Provider Data Collection on Open Online Courses

  Marco Kalz & Karel Kreijns, Open University of the Netherlands; Jaap Walhout; Jonatan Castao-Munoz, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS); Anna Espasa, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya; Edmundo Tovar, Technical University Madrid

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 6 (Dec 03, 2015)

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

• Full Text (external link)