You are here:

The Roles of Mentors in Electronic Learning Environments
Article

, University of Houston-Clear Lake, United States

AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal) Volume 12, Number 3, ISSN 1065-6901 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper describes the roles of mentors to meet the need for mentors in electronic learning (eLearning) environments. The existing literature has documented factors impeding effective eLearning and the multiplicity of the faculty’s roles that demands too much time on the faculty within eLearning environments. This paper argues for the need for mentors to assist instruction and facilitate learning within eLearning environments. The roles of mentors built around the multiple roles of the faculty are then identified as teaching assistants, social connectedness initiators and technical supporters. A guideline for mentors outlining mentors’ roles, responsibilities and contributions was proposed. This guideline may be adopted by mentors as a fundamental job-aid in practicing mentoring. An example of implementation of mentors in an eLearning environment, which resulted in higher learning achievement, was also presented. In conclusion, it is suggested that mentors should be employed within eLearning environments for assisting students overcoming eLearning barriers and achieving effective learning within eLearning environments.

Citation

Chang, S. (2004). The Roles of Mentors in Electronic Learning Environments. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 12(3), 331-342. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 9, 2024 from .

© 2004 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Althaus, S.L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158-174.
  2. Bauman, M. (1997). Online learning communities. Retrieved December 2, 2002, from http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~marcyb/tcc-L.html
  3. Chang, S.L. (2004). Online learning communities with online mentors (OLCOM): A model of online learning communities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(2), 75-88.
  4. Gilbert, N.J., & Driscoll, M.P. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 59-79.
  5. Hill, J.R. (2001). Building community in web-based learning environments: Strategies and techniques. Retrieved December 17, 2002, from http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw01/papers/refereed/hill/paper.html
  6. Hmelo, C.E, Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (1998). Computer-support for collaborative learning: Learning to support student engagement. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(2), 107-129.
  7. Jin, Q. (2002). Design of a virtual community based interactive learning environment. Information Sciences, 140(1-2), 171-191.
  8. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction, and participation in Web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.
  9. Kafai, Y.B., Fishman, B.J., Bruckman, A.S., & Rockman, S. (2002). Models of educational computing @ home: New frontiers for research on technology
  10. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
  11. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Distance education at postsecondary education institutions: 1997-98 (NCES # 2000013). National Center
  12. Northrup, P.T. (2002). Online learners’ preferences for interaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 219-226.
  13. Ragan, L.C. (1998). Good teaching is good teaching: An emerging set of guiding principles and practices for the design and development of distance education. Deosnews, 8(12). Retrieved December 17, 2002 from http://www.ed .psu.edu/acsde/deos/deosnews/deosnews8_12.asp
  14. Ryan, M., Carlton, K.H., & Ali, N.S. (1999). Evaluation of traditional classroom teaching methods versus course delivery via the World Wide Web. Journal of Nursing Education, 38(6), 272-277.
  15. Schlosser, C.A., & Anderson, M.L. (1994). Distance education: Review of the literature. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications
  16. Tu, C.H., & Corry, M. (2002). ELearning communities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 207-218.
  17. Wolcott, L.L. (1996). Distant, but not distanced: A learner-centered approach to distance education. TechTrends, 41(5), 23-27.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References