You are here:

Comprehension and Time Expended for a Doctoral Student with a Learning Disability when Reading with and without an Accommodation
ARTICLE

, , ,

Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal Volume 18, Number 1, ISSN 1046-6819

Abstract

The purpose of this alternating treatment, single-case research study was to compare reading comprehension and time expended reading, of a doctoral student with learning disabilities, under two reading conditions. In condition one, the student used a self-discovered accommodation, that is, listening, on an iPod, to an audiobook version (text-to-speech conversion) of textbook chapters, while concurrently reading those chapters. In condition two, the student read with no accommodation, that is, silently read the textbook chapters. In contrast to the student's pre-study perception that the accommodation improved "everything" about his reading, results indicated that the doctoral student actually comprehended slightly more when he read without rather than with his preferred accommodation. However, the doctoral student took twice as much time to complete the weekly readings when he did not use his preferred accommodation. Thus, for this student, the most distinctive benefit of the reading while-listening accommodation was the time savings he accrued, needing to expend only half as much time as he otherwise expended navigating large volumes of assigned readings from his weekly seminar. Qualitative data further clarified reasons why the student preferred reading-while listening over silent reading. We describe implications of our findings for those who design, provide, or use accommodations and assistive technology to promote reading outcomes. (Contains 2 figures and 2 tables.)

Citation

Tanners, A., McDougall, D., Skouge, J. & Narkon, D. (2012). Comprehension and Time Expended for a Doctoral Student with a Learning Disability when Reading with and without an Accommodation. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(1), 3-10. Retrieved August 8, 2024 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 18, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords