You are here:

"Computer" and "Information and Communication Technology": Students' Culture Specific Interpretations
ARTICLE

, , , , ,

Journal of Educational Technology & Society Volume 13, Number 4, ISSN 1176-3647 e-ISSN 1176-3647

Abstract

Given the use of information and communication technology (ICT) and computer as synonyms in ICT-integration research on the one hand, and the potential problems in doing so on the other, this contribution tries to gain insight in the understanding of the words computer and ICT in different settings. In five different countries (Belgium, Finland, Germany, Ghana and South-Africa) participants engaged in a word-association study. Each study addressed the following research question "Can the notion "computer" be used as a proxy for the notion "information and communication technology"?" A word-association task with "computer" and "information and communication technology" as stimuli words was used in the different studies. Data gathering methods followed the same basic principles but were adopted to diverse contexts of study. In order to analyse the data a shared classification scheme was developed. A chi square test was used to check the similarities and dissimilarities of the categories. In the results, while similar associations are generated by the two stimulus words, it is also clear that computer has a more technical connotation and ICT a broader, more communication-oriented connotation. Different findings in the different cultural settings constitute a warning for naive use of culture-specific research instruments. (Contains 8 tables.)

Citation

Elen, J., Clarebout, G., Sarfo, F.K., Louw, L.P., Poysa-Tarhonen, J. & Stassens, N. (2010). "Computer" and "Information and Communication Technology": Students' Culture Specific Interpretations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 227-239. Retrieved August 14, 2024 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords