You are here:

Investigating the Relationships among Students' Collaboration Preference, Learning Presence and Learning Outcomes in Online Collaborative Learning
PROCEEDINGS

, Ewha Womans University, Korea (South) ; , Jangan College, Korea (South) ; , , , , Ewha Womans University, Korea (South)

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Denver, Colorado, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-95-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Online collaborative learning (OCL) has possible impact on cognitive as well as social and emotional aspects of the human learning. The majority of studies on OCL, however, have focused on cognitive aspect only. This study investigated various learning aspects and their predicting variables in OCL. Based on the previous research, learning achievement, satisfaction and perceived trust are three outcome variables selected to host cognitive, emotional and social aspect of learning. Collaboration preference and learning presence with 3 types of cognitive, social and emotional presence are selected as predictors or mediators of learning outcomes. 47 undergraduate and 6 graduate students enrolled in a course in spring semester of 2011 were participants. The Results showed collaboration preference predicted satisfaction and perceived trust. Cognitive presence mediated collaboration preference and satisfaction. It also mediated collaboration preference and perceived trust. Finally, social presence mediated collaboration preference and perceived trust.

Citation

Kang, M., Kim, M., Kim, B., Yoo, H., Kim, E. & Park, Y. (2012). Investigating the Relationships among Students' Collaboration Preference, Learning Presence and Learning Outcomes in Online Collaborative Learning. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 49-54). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 5, 2024 from .

© 2012 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  2. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F.P. (2003).Joining together: Group theory and group skill.In Group dynamic(8th ed.), BostonMA: Allyn & Bacon.
  3. Jo, I. (2008). Developing an instructional design model based on the social capital theory. Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14(3), 5-30.
  4. Johnson, R.D., Hornik, S., & Salas, E. (2008). An emperical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 356-369.
  5. Joo, Y., Ha. Y., Yoo, J. & Kim, E. (2010). The Structural Relationship among Teaching Presence, Cognitive Presence, Social Presence, and Outcome in Cyber University, Journal of the korean association of information education, 14(2), 175-188.
  6. Kang, M. (2010). Theory and practice of collaborative learning. A sesies of Ewha Education. Ewha Womans Univ., Seoul: Educational Science Institute.
  7. Kang, M., Kim, H., Kim, M., Um, S. & Jung, H. (2010). Investigating the relationship among students' collaboration preference, self-efficacy, interaction and achievement in the web-based collaborative learning, Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 157-180.
  8. Kang, M., Lee, K., Yoon, S., & Kim, M. (2011). Identifying the Relationship among Emotional Presence, Flow, and Learning Outcomes inCorporate E-Learning. Korea Lifelong Education& HRD Institute, 7(2), 125-148.
  9. Kang, M., Park, M., Jung J. & Park, H. (2009). The Effect of Interaction and Learning Presence on Learning Outcome in Web-Based Project Learning. Journal of Educational Information and Media, 15(2), 67-85.
  10. Kirschner, P.A., Kreijns, K., Beers, P.J. & Strijbos, J.W. (2005). Designing electronic tools for collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology, 45(5), 48-52.
  11. Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Brrett-Koehler.
  12. Lim, C., & Oh, Y. (2004). Relations between the Emotional States Perceived by Elementary SchoolChildren and Their Memory on Science Learning Experiences. The Korean journal of biological education, 32(2), 173-180.
  13. Long, H., & Coldren, J. (2006). Interpersonal influences in large lecture-based classes. Teaching, 54(2), 237-243. M. Martinez (2003). High attrition rates in e-Learning: Challenges, predictors, and solutions. The E-Learning Developers' Journal, 1-8.
  14. Newby, T., Stepich, D., Lehman, J., & Russell, J., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2011). Educational technology for teaching and learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  15. Picciano, A.G.(2002, July). Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an Online Course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
  16. Grasha, A.F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Bernardino, CA : Alliance Publishers.
  17. Ritchie, S.M. (2006). Distributed leadership practices in science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), Teaching and learning science: A handbook (pp. 267-273). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  18. Rousseau, D.M, Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: Across-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 393-404.
  19. Rovai, A. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319-332.
  20. Shin, N. (2003). Transactional Presence as a Critical Predictor of Success in Distance Learning, Distance Education, 24(1), 69-86.
  21. Shin, N., & Chan, J.K.Y. (2004). Direct and indirect effects of online learning on distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 275-288.
  22. Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models, Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
  23. Tu, C.H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The Americal Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts