Developing Teachers’ Utilization of Interactive Whiteboards
PROCEEDINGS
Yalin Turel, Firat University, Turkey
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This study investigates the current situations and Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) use in instructional settings by means of a literature review. It provides comprehensive information about what IWBs are, which kinds of features they have, how they can be used to promote the learners’ understanding. It is also crucial to unveil the pros and cons of IWBs explicitly. In order to more effective usage, especially disadvantages of IWB should be well analyzed and then removed to be able to find any prospective solution. The ways of using IWBs are an important issue that needs to be delved. Consequently, this study, which is going to be a first stage of a long-term project, focuses on which ways teachers utilize or should utilize IWBs in their courses. Therefore, it will enable researchers both to design interactive training packages for teachers and to find out the effectiveness regarding learning and interaction for students for latter studies.
Citation
Turel, Y. (2010). Developing Teachers’ Utilization of Interactive Whiteboards. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3049-3054). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 7, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/33833/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Ashfield, J., & Wood, R. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (1), (pp.84 – 96)
- Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13 (3), (pp. 327 – 348).
- Beauchamp, G. & Prakinson, J. (2005) Beyond the‘ wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86 (3), (pp. 97-103).
- BECTA (2003). What the research says about Interactive Whiteboards. Research reviews, paper No. 7.
- BECTA (2004) Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: A guide for secondary schools. Retrieved November 8, 2009 from http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/15091.pdf
- BECTA (2006) Teaching Interactively with Electronic Whiteboards in the Primary Phase. Retrieved October 18, 2009 from http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=25918.
- BESA (2009). ICT Provision& Use in 2009/10. Education Market Outlook Series. September 2009. Retrieved January 2, 2010, from http://www.besa.org.uk
- Brown, S. (2003). Interactive whiteboards in education. Joint Information Systems Committee Technology Centre. Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Interactivewhiteboards.pdf.
- Cogill, J. (2002). How is Interactive Whiteboard being used in the primary school and how doesit affect teachers and teaching. Retrieved Nov 6, 2009, from www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/IFS_Interactive_ whiteboards_in_the_primary_school.pdf
- Gerard, F., & Widener, J. (2000). A SMARTer way to teach foreign language: The SmartBoard interactive Whiteboard as a language learning tool. Retrieved Nov 6, 2009, from http://edcompass.smarttech.com/NR/Rdonlyres/3CABE650-1C29-4E3A-BC21-45BB97F08B0D/0/SBforeignlanguageclass.pdf
- Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sectors. Learning, Media and Technology, 32 (1), (pp. 5-20).
- Hall, I & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted learning¸ 21, (pp. 102 – 117).
- Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25 (3), (pp. 351-365).
- Hutchinson, A. (2007). Literature Review Exploring the Integration of Interactive Whiteboards in K-12 Education. Retrieved Sep 29, 2009 from http://www.innovativelearning.ca/sec-learntech/documents/smart-iwb-litreview07.pdf
- INDIRE (2010). National Agency for the Support of School Autonomy. Www.indire.it
- Lasso, R (2001) Technology in the classroom: Bridging the gap with the MTV generation, Conference Proposal Paper, [Online] Conference on new ideas for experienced teachers: We teach but do they learn? June 9-13, 2001, Alberta, Canada. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://www.aals.org/profdev/newideas/lasso.html.
- Levy P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. Retrieved September 6, 2006, from http://www.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards
- MEB (2010). Turkish Ministry of National Education. Www.meb.gov.tr
- Miller, D.J, Glover, D, & Averis, D. (2003). Exposure–
- Nightingale, J. (2006) Whiteboards under the microscope. The Guardian. 20 June 2006. Retrieved January, 2, 2010, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/jun/20/elearning.technology.
- Smart (2006). Interactive whiteboards and learning: Improving student learning outcomes and streamlining lesson
- Smith, L. (2008). An investigation into the effect of a NATE/Becta training programme on the use of interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning in Secondary English. English in Education. 42 (3).
- Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., Özdemir, S. (2009). Board ’ s IQ: What makes a board smart? Computers& Education, 53. Tolley, R.C. (N.D.). The Use of Interactive Whiteboards in Schools. Retrieved January 5, 2010, from http://www.maximise-ict.co.uk/IWBs.pdf
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
The Interactive Whiteboard: Uses, Benefits, and Challenges. A survey of 11,683 Students and 1,131 Teachers
Thierry Karsenti
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 42, No. 5 (Dec 31, 2016)
-
Contextual Factors Relevant to Elementary Teachers Using Interactive Whiteboards in Mathematics Classroom Discourse
Omar Lopez, Texas State University - Round Rock Campus, United States; Cheri Krockover, Educational Technology Consultant, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 25, No. 3 (July 2014) pp. 405–426
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.
Slides
- presentation_3040_29667.ppt (Access with Subscription)