Patterns and principles for blended synchronous learning: Engaging remote and face-to-face learners in rich-media real-time collaborative activities
ARTICLE
Matt Bower, Jacqueline Kenney, Macquarie University ; Barney Dalgarno, Mark Lee, Charles Sturt University ; Gregor Kennedy, The University of Melbourne
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 30, Number 3, ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Abstract
Blended synchronous learning involves using rich-media technologies to enable remote and face-to-face students to jointly participate in the same live classes. This article presents blended synchronous learning designs from seven case studies that were part of a project funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching and articulates principles for implementation as espoused by the teachers who enacted them. A wide range of technologies (including video conferencing, web conferencing and virtual worlds), tasks (namely collaborative evaluation, group questioning, class discussion, problem solving and collaborative design) and levels of student interaction (from lightweight to tightly coupled) were present within the designs. The main issues that teachers confronted when facilitating blended synchronous lessons were those relating to communication and those relating to cognitive overload caused by split attention. Key pedagogical principles for enactment as identified by the lead teachers included the need for extensive preparation, clear instructions, composure, flexibility, advance preparation of students and savvy utilisation of support staff.
Citation
Bower, M., Kenney, J., Dalgarno, B., Lee, M. & Kennedy, G. (2014). Patterns and principles for blended synchronous learning: Engaging remote and face-to-face learners in rich-media real-time collaborative activities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3),. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved August 8, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/148485/.
References
View References & Citations Map- Beltrán Sierra, L.M., Gutiérrez, R.S., & Garzón-Castro, C.L. (2012). Second Life as a support element for learning electronic related subjects: A real case. Computers& Education, 58, 291–302.
- Bower, M., Cram, A., & Groom, D. (2010). Blended reality: Issues and potentials in combining virtual worlds and face-to-face classes. In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology& Transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 129–140). Brisbane, Australia.
- Bower, M., Kennedy, G.E., Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M.J.W. (2011). Uniting on-campus and distributed learners through media-rich synchronous tools: A national project. In G. Williams, N. Brown, M. Pittard, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011 (pp. 150–155). Hobart, Australia.
- Bower, M., Kennedy, G.E., Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.W., Kenney, J., & De Barba, P. (2012). Use of media-rich real-time collaboration tools for learning and teaching in Australian and New Zealand universities. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett, & T. Stewart (Eds.), Future challenges, sustainable futures. Proceedings ascilite Wellington 2012. Wellington, New Zealand.
- Gosper, M., Green, D., McNeill, M., Phillips, R., Preston, G., & Woo, K. (2008). The impact of webbased lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching [Final project report]. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Sydney, Australia.
- Irvine, V. (2009). The emergence of choice in ‘multi-access’ learning environments: Transferring locus of control of course access to the learner. In G. Siemens& C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 746–752).
- James, R., Krause, K., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Melbourne, Australia.
- Lidstone, J., & Shield, P. (2010). Virtual reality or virtually real: Blended teaching and learning in a Master’s level research methods class. In Y. Inoue (Ed.), Cases on online and blended learning technologies in higher education: Concepts and practices (pp. 91–111). Hershey, PA: Information
- Norberg, A. (2012). Blended learning and new education logistics in Northern Sweden. In D.G. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers: Education and information technologies (pp. 327–330). Boulder, CO:
- Power, M. (2008). The emergence of a blended online learning environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 513–514.
- Power, M., & Vaughan, N. (2010). Redesigning online learning for international graduate seminar delivery. The Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 19–38.
- Roseth, C., Akcaoglu, M., & Zellner, A. (2013). Blending synchronous face-to-face and computersupported cooperative learning in a hybrid doctoral seminar. TechTrends, 57(3), 54–59.
- Spann, D. (2012). Five innovative ways to use virtual classrooms in higher education. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett, & T. Stewart (Eds.), Future challenges, sustainable futures. Proceedings ascilite Wellington 2012. Wellington, New Zealand.
- Stewart, A.R., Harlow, D.B., & DeBacco, K. (2011). Students’ experience of synchronous learning in distributed environments. Distance Education, 32, 357–381.
- Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2013). TEQSA and the Australian Qualifications Framework: Questions and answers.
- White, C.P., Ramirez, R., Smith, J.G., & Plonowski, L. (2010). Simultaneous delivery of a face-to-face course to on-campus and remote off-campus students. TechTrends, 54(4), 34–40.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References