Low Level Architecture: Initial Reports from the Classroom
PROCEEDINGS
Michael Piller, National Defense Unveristy, United States ; Michael Miller, National Defense University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-56-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
Building on its successful eLearning program, the Information Resources Management (IRM) College at the National Defense University has created a set of practical standards for creating and embedding rich, interactive media in online courses. An update to a "low level architecture" is presented highlighting types of multimedia implemented in courses, rationale for media development, and initial student satisfaction with the LLA and media effort.
Citation
Piller, M. & Miller, M. (2005). Low Level Architecture: Initial Reports from the Classroom. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4352-4356). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 6, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/20762/.
© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Baddeley, A. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Brünken, R., Steinbacher, S., Plass, J., Leutner, D. (2002). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology. Experimental Psychology, 49(2), 109-119.
- Card, S., Mackinlay, J., and Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in Information Visualization Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA.
- Department of Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. (1996). High Level Architecture Baseline Definition. Retrieved on December 1, 2003, from https://www.dmso.mil/public/transition/hla
- Mayer, E., Massa, L. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833-846.
- Mayer, R., Heiser, J., Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187-198.
- Mayer, R., Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in Multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
- Miller, M., Childes, R. (2003). Practical modeling and simulation for online courses: Proposal for a “low level architecture”. Paper presented at ED-Media World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland.
- Moreno, R., Mayer, R. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
- Pavio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual-coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Shavinina, L., Loarer, E. (1999). Psychological evaluation of educational multimedia applications. European Psychologist, 4(1), 33-44.
- Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Best Practices for Implementing New Technologies in Existing Postgraduate Online and Residential Courses
Dina Kurzweil, Beth Hottle, Michael Miller & Michael Piller, National Defense University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 531–536
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.
