You are here:

Reimagining Pedagogical Content Knowledge for the 21st Century
PROCEEDING

, Stephen F. Austin State University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) is a theoretical framework that has enjoyed widespread applications as it applies to the integration of technology in the teaching and learning process. This paper reviews the background for TPACK, discusses some of its limitations, and reviews and introduces a new theoretical framework, 21st Century Pedagogical Content Knowledge (21st Century PCK), to clarify the discourse surrounding teaching and learning in an increasingly technological world.

Citation

Slough, S. (2016). Reimagining Pedagogical Content Knowledge for the 21st Century. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 775-784). Washington, DC, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 9, 2024 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers& Education, 52, 154–168.
  2. Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical Considerations of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators (2nd ed., pp. 11–33).
  3. Archambault, L.M., & Barnett, J.H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: exploring the TPACK framework. Computers& Education, 55, 1656–1662.
  4. Bryan, J., & Slough, S.W. (2009). Converging lens simulation design and image predictions. Physics Education, 44, 264-275.
  5. Chamblee, G.E., & Slough, S.W. (2004). Using the Concerns-Based Adoption Model to assess changes in technology implementation: A ten-year retrospective. In R. Ferdig& C. Crawford (Eds.), Society for technology and teacher education annual, 20004 (pp. 864-871). Association for the Advancement of
  6. Dede, C. (2011). Reconceptualizing technology integration to meet the challenges of educational transformation. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(1), 4–16.
  7. Dewey, J. & Bently, A.F. (1949). Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.
  8. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41, 319–346.
  9. Dougherty, D. (2013). The make mindset. In M. Honey& D.E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 7-11). New York, NY: Routledge
  10. Ertmer, P.A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
  11. Guess-Newsome, J. (2002). Pedagogical content knowledge: an introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and science education (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic
  12. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102.
  13. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P. & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers& Education, 49(3), 740-762.
  14. Lee, Y. & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers& Education, 73, 121-128.
  15. Lee, M.H., & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the WorldWide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21.
  16. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York, NY; Penguin Press.
  17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework For Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017.
  18. Mishra, P., & Kereluik, K. (2011). What 21 st century learning? A review and a synthesis. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 3301–3312). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  19. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. Educating the net generation, 2(1-2), 20. Retrieved from http://judicialaffairs.tamucc.edu/assets/IsItAge.pdf.
  20. Pierson, M.E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413–429.
  21. Slough, S.W. (1998). High school science teachers' perceptions of telecommunications utilizing a concerns-based adoption model (CBAM). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
  22. Slough, S.W. (2010). High-tech solutions from a low-tech teacher: Learning new tricks from an unlikely source. In D. Gipson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Society for technology and teacher education annual 2010 (pp. 3619-3626).
  23. Slough, S.W., & Connell, M. (2006). Defining technogogy and its natural corollary, Technogogical Content Knowledge (TCK). In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Society for technology and teacher education annual 2006 (pp. 1053-1059). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  24. Slough, S.W., Connell, M.L., & Chamblee, G.E. (2015). Looking for learners: The legacy of Technogogical Content Knowledge (TCK). In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Society for technology and teacher education annual 2015 (pp. 3411-3417) Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  25. Slough, S.W. & Milam, J. (2008). Theoretical framework for STEM project-based learning. In R.M. Capraro& S.W. Slough (Eds>), Projectbased learning:An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 19-37). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.
  26. Slough, S. & Slough, P. (2015). 21st century pedagogical content knowledge. In S. Carliner, C. Fulford& N. Ostashewski (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2015 (pp. 1207-1214). Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
  27. Tyner, K. (2008). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  28. Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computers Assisted Learning, 29¸403-413.
  29. Wegerif, R.B., & Dawes, L. (2004). Thinking and learning with ICT: Raising achievement in primary classrooms. London: Routledge.
  30. Yeh, Y.H., Hsu, Y.S., Wu, H.K., Hwang, F.K., & Lin, T.C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 707–722.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections