Contextualizing Motivational Interviewing Through Cognitive Apprenticeship
Proceeding
Zach Warner, University of Cincinnati, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
This paper describes the creation of an online learning module for motivational interviewing (MI) as part of a larger design based research (DBR) study intended to contextualize the training of the skill through the application of the cognitive apprenticeship instructional model. A thorough description of the cycles of DBR are provided, including problem analysis, the design of the module in collaboration with a certified MI trainer, development and pilot testing of an initial prototype, and decisions regarding future directions of the project in response to feedback from the learners. The paper emphasizes the iterative nature of the design process, as well as the explicit connections between the instructional need, the design decisions, and the principles of the cognitive apprenticeship model in accordance with the overarching goal of DBR to align theory with practice.
Citation
Warner, Z. (2016). Contextualizing Motivational Interviewing Through Cognitive Apprenticeship. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1612-1617). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 6, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173161/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
- Burke, P.J., Silva, J.D., Vaughan, B.L., & Knight, J.R. (2006). Training high school counselors on the use of motivational interviewing to screen for substance abuse. Substance Abuse, 26(3-4), 31-34.
- Chan, P., Miller, R., & Monroe, E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship as an instructional strategy for solving corporate training challenges. TechTrends, 53(6), 35-41.
- Coles, E.K., Owens, J.S., Serrano, V.J., Slavec, J., Evans, S.W. (2015). From consultation to student outcomes: The role of teacher knowledge, skills, and beliefs in increasing integrity in classroom management strategies. School Mental Health, 7, 34-48.
- Collins, A. (1990) Toward a design science in education. In E. Scanlon& T.O’Shea (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology (pp. 15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag
- Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11.
- The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 5-8.
- Driscoll, M.P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson
- Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K.M., Land, S.M., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded design and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101 – 117.
- McKenney, S., & Reeves, T.C. (2013). Conducting educational research design. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York: Guilford Press.
- Reinke, W., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Merrell, K. (2008). The classroom check-up: A classwide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 37, 315–332. Retrieved April 21, 2015 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2603055/ Small, J.W., Lee, J., Frey, A.J., Seeley, J.R., & Walker, H.M. (2014). The development of instruments to measure motivational interviewing skill acquisition for school-based personnel. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 7(4), 240-254.
- Wang, F., & Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References