References

1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665.
2. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174.
3. Catchpole, M.J. (1993). Interactive media: the bridge between distance and classroom education. In T. Nunan (Ed.), Distance education futures (pp. 37-56). Adelaide: University of South Australia Press.
4. Cochrance, T. (2005). Interactive quicktime: Developing and evaluating multimedia learning objects to enhance both face-to-face and distance e-learning environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 33-54. Available at http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p033-054Cochrane.pdf Cohen, E.B., & Nycz, M. (2005). Learning objects and e-learning: An informing science perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 23-34. Available at http://ijklo.org/Volume2/v2p023-034Cohen32.pdf
5. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319.
6. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982.
7. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
8. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
9. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91-109.
10. Gonzalez, R. (2000). Disciplining multimedia. IEEE Multimedia, 7, 72-78.
11. Heijden, H.V.D. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information& Management, 40(6), 541-549.
12. Hiltz, S.R. (1995). Teaching in a virtual classroom. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 185.
13. Hsu, C.-L., & Lu, H.-P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information& Management, 41(7), 853-868.
14. Kim, E.B., & Schniederjans, M.J. (2004). The Role of Personality in Web-based Distance Education Courses. Communications of ACM, 47(3), 95.
15. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information& Management, 40, 191-204.
16. Lu, J., Yu, C.-S., & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information& Management, 40, 497-507.
17. Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information& Management, 38 (4), 217-230.
18. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401.
19. Rivard, S.H. (1988). Factors for success for end-user computing. Communications of ACM, 31(5), 552561.
20. Saadé, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information& Management, 42(2), 261-386.
21. Saadé, R., & Galloway, I. (2005). Understanding intention to use multimedia information systems for learning. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 2, 287-296. Available at http://2005papers.iisit.org/I23f15Saad.pdf Salas, de K. & Ellis, L. (2006). The development and implementation of leaning objects in a higher education setting, Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 1-22. Available at http://ijklo.org/Volume2/v2p001-022deSalas.pdf
22. Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G., & Laia, R.Y.C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega, 27(1), 25-37.
23. Varlamis, I. & Apostolakis, I. (2006). The present and future of standards for e-learning technologies, Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 59-76. Available at http://ijklo.org/Volume2/v2p059-076Varlamis.pdf Wang, Y.-S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information& Management, 41(1), 75-86.
24. Wilson, B.G. (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
25. Yi, M.Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431-449.

Cited By

• Faculty's acceptance of computer based technology: Cross-validation of an extended model

  Tunku Ahmad, Kamal Madarsha, Ahmad Zainuddin, Nik Ismail, Mohamad Nordin & Mohamad Nordin

  Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 26, No. 2 (Jan 01, 2010)

• Evaluating e-Learning Initiatives: A Literature Review on Methods and Research Frameworks

  Nikolaos Tselios & Stelios Daskalakis, University of Patras, Greece

  International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies Vol. 6, No. 1 (January 2011) pp. 35–51

• An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Mobile Wireless Technology Adoption for Promoting Interactive Lectures in Higher Education

  Chin Gan & Vimala Balakrishnan, University of Malaya

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 1 (Feb 02, 2016)

• The Role of Peer Influence and Perceived Quality of Teaching in Faculty Acceptance of Web-Based Learning Management Systems

  Florin D Salajan, North Dakota State University, United States; Anita G Welch, Emirates College for Advanced Education, United Arab Emirates; Chris M Ray & Claudette Peterson, North Dakota State University, United States

  International Journal on E-Learning 14 (2015) pp. 487–524

• An Analysis of ODL Student Perception and Adoption Behavior Using the Technology Acceptance Model

  Ean Teng Khor

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 6 (Oct 22, 2014) pp. 275–288

• Students’ Perceptions on Incorporating E-Learning into Teaching and Learning at the University of Ghana

  Michael Tagoe, Institute of Continuing and Distance Education, University of Ghana, P.O. Box 31, Ghana

  International Journal of Education and Development using ICT Vol. 8, No. 1 (Apr 30, 2012) pp. 91–103

• A Measurement of Faculty Perceptions and Usage of Learning Technologies through Authentic Testing and Qualitative Assessment

  Florin Salajan, Anita Welch, Claudette Peterson & Chris Ray, North Dakota State University, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (Oct 18, 2011) pp. 2500–2509

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

• Full Text (external link)