You are here:

Differences in Rate of Response to Web-Based Surveys Among College Students
Article

, Wake Forest University, United States ; , The Ohio State University, United States ; , Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine, United States ; , Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, United States ; , Wake Forest University, United States

International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This article provides a broad overview of the definition of web-based surveys examining some of the benefits and burdens related to using the Web for data collection. It draws upon the experience of two years of data collection on 10 university campuses demonstrating that there are noticeable differences in the speed with which web-based surveys can be conducted with a broad cross-section of college students. These differences are related to the technology environment of college campuses, gender, school year, and other factors that surveyors need to consider when deciding on conducting web-based surveys.

Citation

Mitra, A., Jain-Shukla, P., Robbins, A., Champion, H. & Durant, R. (2008). Differences in Rate of Response to Web-Based Surveys Among College Students. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 265-281. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 1, 2024 from .

© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alvarez, R. M., Sherman, R. P., & Beselaere, C. V. (2002). Subject acquisition for web based surveys. Working paper number 5. Retrieved June 20, 2005, from http://lawweb.usc.edu/cslp/papers/cslp-wp-005.pdf
  2. Archer, T.M. (2003). Web-based surveys. Journal of Extension, 41(4). Retrieved September 20, 2004, from http://www.joe.org/joe/2003august/tt6.shtml
  3. Bosnjak, M., & Tuten, T.L. (2001). Classifying response behaviors in webbased surveys. Journal of Computer-Med iated Communication, 6(3). Retrieved April 1, 2004, from
  4. Carbonaro, M., Bainbridge, J., & Wolodko, B. (2002). Using internet surveys to gather research data from teachers: Trials and tribulations. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 275-292.
  5. Carini, R.M., Hayek, J.C., Kuh, G.D., Kennedy, J.M., & Ouimet, J.A. (2003). College student response to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 1-19.
  6. Conrad, F., Ehlen, P., & Schober, M. F. (2003, May). How web surveys differ from other kinds of user interfaces. Paper presented at The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) 58th Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.
  7. Coomber, R. (1997). Using the internet for survey research. Sociological Research Online, 2(2). Retrieved December 30, 2007, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/2.html
  8. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Dillman, D. A., & Bowker, D. K. (2001). The web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In U.-D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of internet science (pp. 159-178). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
  10. Dillman, D. A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., & Berck, J. (2001). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response and the internet. Draft paper retr ieved December 15, 2004, from
  11. Dillman, D.A., Tortora, R.D., & Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for constructing web surveys. Social and Economic Sciences Research Center (SESRC) Technical Report 98-50. Retrieved September 14, 2004, from http://www.isurveys.com.au/resources/ppr.pdf
  12. Dillman, D.A., Tortora, R.D., Conradt, J., & Bowker, D. (1998, August). Influence of plain vs. Fancy design on response rates for web surveys. Paper presented at Joint Statistical Meetings, Dallas, TX.
  13. Franceschini, L. A. (2000, November). Navigating electronic survey methods: Three pilot studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY.
  14. Heerwegh, D. (2002, October). Describing response behavior in web surveys using client side paradata. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Websurveys, Mannheim, Germany.
  15. Heerwegh, D., & Looseveldt, G. (2002). Web surveys: The effect of controlling survey access using PIN numbers. Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 10-21.
  16. Idleman, L. (2003, April). Comparing responses to mail and web-based surveys. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Kimball, L. (1998). Easier evaluation with web-based tools. Training and Development, 52(4), 54-55. Manfreda, K. L., Batagelj, Z., & Vehovar, V. (2002). Design of web survey questionnaire: Three basic experiments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communications, 7(3). Retrieved January 11, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue3/vehovar.html
  17. Mertler, C. (2001, October). Lessons learned from the administration of a web-based survey. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  18. Mertler, C. (2002a). Demonstrating the potential for web-based survey methodology with a case study. American Secondary Education, 30(2), 49-61.
  19. Mertler, C. (2002b, April). Web based surveys: Guiding lessons for their use. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Mitra, A., Willyard, J., Platt, C. A., & Parsons, M. (2005). Exploring web usage and selection criteria among male and female students. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Retrieved January 11, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/mitra.html Moss, J. & Hendry, G. (2002). Use of electronic surveys in course evaluation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 583-592.
  20. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Alyssa, B. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432.
  21. Shannon, D. M., & Bradshaw, C. C. (2002). A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(2), 179-192. Smith, C.B. (1997). Casting the net: Surveying an internet population. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/smith.html Solomon, D.J. (2001). Conducting web-based surveys. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(19). Retrieved April 21, 2004, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=19 Timmerman, A. (2002). Introduction to the application of web-based surveys. Retrieved January 11, 2008 from http://er Ic.ed.gov/ER ICDocs/data/er icdocs2sq l/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1a/da/55.pdf
  22. Tomsic, M. L., Hendel, D.D., & Matross, R.P. (2000, May). A world wide web response to student satisfaction surveys: Comparisons using paper and internet formats. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for International Research, Cincinnati, OH.
  23. Yeaworth, R.C. (2001). Use of the internet in survey research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17(4), 187-193.
  24. Yun, G.W., & Trumbo, C.W. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, email, and web form, 6. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved April 20, 2004, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.