You are here:

A Framework for Designing Instructional Computer-Based Simulations: Research-Based Strategies for Appropriate Design
Proceeding

, University of Tampa, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

In education and training, instructional computer-based simulations allow learners to interact with the model of a system and help them conceptualize complex and abstract concepts. Ideally, computer-based simulations help learners develop deeper knowledge and more reflective thinking. This paper discusses instructional computer-based simulations from an instructional design perspective. In this paper, the researcher addresses the role of instructional computer-based simulations in education and training, including the advantages and disadvantages of this type of educational technology strategy. Additionally, the researcher discusses a framework for designing instructional computer-based simulations that considers design affordances such as the simulation scenario, interface development, and level of fidelity. This paper provides an overview of instructional computer-based simulations and discusses key design principles for enhancing their effectiveness.

Citation

Romero-Hall, E. (2016). A Framework for Designing Instructional Computer-Based Simulations: Research-Based Strategies for Appropriate Design. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1604-1611). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 1, 2024 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Anderson, J.M., Aylor, M.E., & Leonard, D.T. (2008). Instructional design dogma: Creating planned learning experiences in simulation. Journal of Critical Care, 23(4), 595-602.
  2. Bindoff, I., Ling, T., Bereznicki, L., Westbury, J., Chalmers, L., Peterson, G., & Ollington, R. (2014). A Computer Simulation of Community Pharmacy Practice for Educational Use. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(9), 1-8. Retrieved from http://esearch.ut.edu/login? Url= http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
  3. Chen, C.-H., Wu, I.C., & Jen, F.-L. (2013). Designing online scaffolds for interactive computer simulation. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(3), 229-243.
  4. Choi, W. (1997). Designing effective scenarios for computer-based instructional simulations: Classification of essential features. Educational Technology, 37(5), 13-21.
  5. Chua, A.Y.K. (2005). The design and implementation of a simulation game for teaching knowledge management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 12071216.
  6. Curtin, M.M., & Dupuis, M.D. (2008). Development of human patient simulation programs: Achieving big results with a small budget. Part of the special issue, Simulation, 47(11), 522-523.
  7. Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G., & Bennett, S. (2014). The impact of students’ exploration strategies on discovery learning using computer-based simulations. Educational Media International, 51(4), 310-329.
  8. Eckhardt, M., Urhahne, D., Conrad, O., & Harms, U. (2013). How effective is instructional support for learning with computer simulations? Instructional Science, 41(1), 105-124. Doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9220-y
  9. Feinstein, A.H., & Cannon, H.M. (2002). Constructs of Simulation Evaluation. Simulation& Gaming, 33(4), 425-440.
  10. Fida, M., & Kassab, S.E. (2015). Do medical students' scores using different assessment instruments predict their scores in clinical reasoning using a computer-based simulation? Advances in Medical Education& Practice, 6, 135-141.
  11. Friedl, K.E., & O'Neil, H.F. (2013). Designing and Using Computer Simulations in Medical Education and Training: An Introduction. Military Medicine, 1-6.
  12. Homer, B.D., & Plass, J.L. (2014). Level of interactivity and executive functions as predictors of learning in computer-based chemistry simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 36(0), 365-375.
  13. Johnson, W.L. (2001). Pedagogical agent research at CARTE. AI Magazine, 22(4), 85-94.
  14. Koenig, A., Iseli, M., Wainess, R., & Lee, J.J. (2013). Assessment Methodology for Computer-Based Instructional Simulations. Military Medicine, 47-54.
  15. Kreiter, C.D., Haugen, T., Leaven, T., Goerdt, C., Rosenthal, N., McGaghie, W.C., & Dee, F. (2011). A report on the piloting of a novel computer-based medical case simulation for teaching and formative assessment of diagnostic laboratory testing. Medical Education Online, 16(1), 1-7.
  16. Martin, A. (2000). The design and evolution of a simulation/game for teaching information systems development. Simulation& Gaming, 31(4), 445-463.
  17. Rickel, J., Marsella, S., Gratch, J., Hill, R., Traum, D., & Swartout, W. (2002). Toward a new generation of virtual humans for interactive experiences. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 17(4), 32-38.
  18. Schmidt, S.J. (2003). Active and cooperative learning using web-based simulations. Journal of Economic Education, 34(2), 151-167. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? Direct=true&db=bth&AN=17562950&site=ehost-live
  19. Stanney, K.M., & Cohn, J. (2006). Virtual environments. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (3rd ed., pp. 1079-1096). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley& Sons, Inc.
  20. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? Direct=true&db=ehh&AN=965008&site=ehost-live
  21. Tor, S., Jan, Å., Greg, A., & Ron, B. (2014). A framework for the design of computer-assisted simulation training for complex police situations. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 31(4), 242-253.
  22. Wilson, R.D., Klein, J.D., & Hagler, D. (2014). Computer-Based or Human Patient Simulation-Based Case Analysis: Which Works Better for Teaching Diagnostic Reasoning Skills? Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(1), 14-18.
  23. Yaman, M., Nerdel, C., & Bayrhuber, H. (2008). The effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations. Computers& Education, 51(4), 1784-1794.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections