You are here:

Comparisons of Social Competence in Young Children with and without Hearing Loss: A Dynamic Systems Framework
ARTICLE

, ,

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Volume 20, Number 2, ISSN 1081-4159

Abstract

This study compared levels of social competence and language development in 74 young children with hearing loss and 38 hearing peers aged 2.5-5.3 years. This study was the first to examine the relationship between oral language and social competence using a dynamic systems framework in children with and without hearing loss. We hypothesized that, due to deficits in oral language, children who were deaf would display lower levels of social competence than their hearing peers. Furthermore, language age would predict social competence scores. Social competence was measured with a general and deaf-specific measure. Results showed that children with hearing loss performed significantly worse than hearing peers on the general measure but better than the norms on the deaf-specific measure. Controlling for maternal education and income, regression analyses indicated that hearing status and language age predicted social competence in both groups. Among children with hearing loss, correlations were also found between age at diagnosis, age at amplification, and two of the general social competence measures. Results supported our hypothesis that deficits in language would have cascading negative effects on the development of social competence in young deaf children. Development of early intervention programs that target both language and social skills are needed for this population.

Citation

Hoffman, M.F., Quittner, A.L. & Cejas, I. (2015). Comparisons of Social Competence in Young Children with and without Hearing Loss: A Dynamic Systems Framework. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(2), 115-124. Retrieved August 9, 2024 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords