Abstract

The purpose of this article is to summarize the current literature on the accuracy and reliability of interval systems using data from previously published experimental studies that used either human observations of behavior or computer simulations. Although multiple comparison studies provided mathematical adjustments or modifications to interval systems, recommendations were often noted as impractical or inefficient for use by early intervention/early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) practitioners. Based on the review of previous comparisons, none of the interval systems were accurate estimates of frequency; thus, event recording should be used to measure counts of behavior in early childhood settings. Momentary time sampling (MTS) may be appropriate and feasible for estimating duration, but only if random error is considered; partial (PIR) and whole interval recording (WIR) systems are inappropriate unless a statistical correction procedure is devised. Recommendations for using interval-based systems in applied research with young children with disabilities are provided.

Citation

Lane, J.D. & Ledford, J.R. (2014). Using Interval-Based Systems to Measure Behavior in Early Childhood Special Education and Early Intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 83-93. Retrieved August 9, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/155069/.

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

• Accuracy
• Child Behavior
• Comparative Analysis
• Computer Simulation
• Disabilities
• early childhood education
• early intervention
• Error Correction
• Experiments
• Intervals
• Literature Reviews
• Measures (Individuals)
• special education