You are here:

Mobile Device: Undergraduate student and faculty uses for academics in and out of class
PROCEEDINGS

, Concordia University Irvine, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

As mobile devices become more and more ubiquitous amongst teens, they are fighting their way into the educational landscape. With the rapid changes in technology and the focus on education to integrate it, this study is timely. Educators find it difficult to capture the attention of their students and motivate them to stay engaged in formal class. Historically, education has been device centric, focusing on the tool rather than the ways in which that tool can be used. Using TPACK, or technological, pedagogical, content knowledge pulls the attention from the specific devices and focuses on how those devices can be used. This study will look at how undergraduate students and higher education faculties use mobile devices in and out of the class for academic purposes. It will suggest TPACK as an educational framework for educators to integrate these devices into their instruction. Key words: mobile devices, TPACK, formal learning, informal learning

Citation

Hoffmann, M. (2015). Mobile Device: Undergraduate student and faculty uses for academics in and out of class. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3216-3226). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 13, 2024 from .

© 2015 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class everyday. Washington,
  2. Archambault, L.M., & Barnett, J.H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers& Education, 55(4), 1656-1662.
  3. Barnhart, F.D., & Pierce, J.E. (2011). Becoming mobile: Reference in the ubiquitous library. Journal of Library Administration, 51(3), 279-290.
  4. Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.
  5. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  6. Bull, G., Thompson, A., Searson, M., Garofalo, J., Park, J., Young, C., & Lee, J. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning: Experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 100-107. Retrieved from
  7. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, http://www.citejournal.org/vol8/iss2/maintoc.cfm Pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 13(4), 6373.
  8. Chen, B., & DeNoyelles, A. (2013, October 7). Exploring students’ mobile learning practices in higher education. Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/exploring-studentsmobile-learning-practices-higher-education
  9. Connaway, L.S., & Dickey, T.J. (2010). The digital information seeker: Report of the findings from selected OCLC, RIN, and JISC user behaviour projects. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. Mobile devices. International Journal Of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 4(3), 9-18.
  10. Greco, K. (2013). FAA to allow airlines to expand use of personal electronics [Press release]. Retrieved from
  11. Cruz-Flores, R., & Lopez-Morteo, G. (2010). A framework for educational collaborative activities based on
  12. Dewey, J. (1988). Experience and education. In J.A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works, 1925-1953 (Vol. 13, pp. 45-49). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1938)
  13. Gergen, K.J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J.E. Katz& M.A. Aakhus (Eds.) Perpetual contact: University Press. GSMA, & A.T. Kearney. (2013). The mobile economy 2013. Retrieved from http://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=15254Http://www.gsmamobileeconomy.com/GSMA%20Mobile%20Economy%202013.pdf
  14. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. Retrieved from JRTESumm09.pdf/80124231/HarrisMishraKoehler-JRTESumm09.pdf http://activitytypes.wmwikis.net/file/view/HarrisMishraKoehlerhttp://mobilemarketingmagazine.com/more-mobile-phone-access-toothbrushes-says DASHDASH
  15. Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy (1993). PBL network: Collaborative inquiry in action. Retrieved from http://pbln.imsa.edu/model/intro/differences.html
  16. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 32-43.
  17. Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan
  18. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2010). Learning cultures on the move: Where are we heading? Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 13(4), 4-14. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info
  19. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247-254.
  20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Kaufmann.
  21. Merchant, G. (2012). Mobile practices in everyday life: Popular digital technologies and schooling revisited. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 770-782.
  22. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher Number of Android available apps. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.appbrain.com/stats/number-ofknowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Doi:10.1111/J.1467-9620.2006.00684.xandroid-apps
  23. Nyíri, K. (2007). Mobile studies: Paradigms and perspectives. Vienna, AT: Passagen Verlag.
  24. Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H.B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instruments. Educational Informational Technology, 2013, 1-23. .
  25. Plant, S. (2001). On the mobile: The effects of mobile telephones on individual and social life. Retrieved from
  26. Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105. Retrieved from
  27. Rainie, L., & Smith, A. (2013, October 18). Tablet and e-reader ownership update. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/18/tablet-and-e-reader-ownership-update/ Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Hazlewood, W., & Tedesco, L. (2010). Enhancing learning: A study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(2), 111-124.
  28. Shaffer, D.W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillian.
  29. Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo Sánchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. De Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 233-249). Heidelberg, DE: Springer.
  30. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews& C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of elearning research (pp. 221-247). London, UK: Sage.
  31. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4Smith, A. (2010, July 7). Mobile access 2010. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org14.
  32. Sørensen, C., Mathiassen, L., & Kakihara, M. (2002, May). Mobile services: Functional diversity and overload.
  33. Straumsheim, C. (2013, September 5). Device explosion. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from Paper presented at New Perspectives On 21st-Century Communications, Budapest, HU. Http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/09/05/wireless-devices-weigh-down-campusnetworks
  34. Sung, E., & Mayer, R.E. (2013). Online multimedia learning with mobile devices and desktop computers: An experimental test of Clark’s methods-not-media hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 639-647.
  35. Terras, M.M., & Ramsay, J. (2012). The five central psychological challenges facing effective mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 820-832.
  36. Thuermer, K. (2012, September 1). Do mobile devices enhance teaching and learning? Independent School. Retrieved from http://www.nais.org/Magazines-Newsletters/ISMagazine/Pages/Do-mobiledevices-enhance-teaching-and-learning.aspx
  37. Timberg, C. (2013, February 25). Mobile device connections growing quickly. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-02-25/business/37279129_1_mobile-walletsmobile-services-mobile-world-congress
  38. Ting, Y. (2012). The pitfalls of mobile devices in learning: A different view and implications for pedagogical
  39. Tomak, H.S., Incikabi, L., & Ozgelen, S. (2012). An investigation of change in mathematics, science, and literacy education pre-service teachers’ TPACK. Asia-Pacific Educational Resource, 22(4), 407-415.
  40. Tomak, H.S., Yelken, T., & Konokman, Y.G. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions on development of their .
  41. Tough, A. (1979). The adult’s learning projects (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, CA: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
  42. Traxler, J. (2009). Current state of mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.) Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 9-24). Edmonton, Alberta, CA: Athabasca University Press.
  43. Wu, W.H., Jim Wu, Y.C., Chen, C.Y., Kao, H.Y., Lin, C.H., & Huang, S.H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers& Education, 59(2), 817-827.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections