You are here:

Exploring learners’ attitudes toward augmented reality learning system
PROCEEDINGS

, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan ; , Department of Computer Science, Simon Fraser University, Canada ; , Facuty of Arts, University of British Columbia, Canada ; , General Education Center, China Medical University, Taiwan

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Victoria, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-03-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) appears as an attractive technology that promises to allow learners to realize the virtual and real objects coexist at the same time. Previous experiences in the application of augmented reality in educational contexts were quite successful. The AR learning environment enables learners to make use of extensive interactions with the system and real world. This study attempts to build a prototype of augmented reality learning system for health care. In order to evaluate the learners’ attitude toward the system, TAM (technology acceptance model) was applied. The result showed that perceived usefulness is the only and most important factor to affect learners’ attitude toward using the AR learning system.

Citation

Huang, H.M., Liaw, Y.H.A., Liaw, Y.T.A. & Liaw, S.S. (2013). Exploring learners’ attitudes toward augmented reality learning system. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2013--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1003-1011). Victoria, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 6, 2024 from .

© 2013 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 14 319-340.
  2. El Sayed, N.A.M., Zayed, H.H., Sharawy, M.I.(2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card: An augmented reality solution for the education field. Computers& Education,56,1045–1061.
  3. Huang, M.-M., Rauch, U. And Liaw, S.-S. (2010), Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers& Education, 55(3), pp. 1171-82.
  4. Hsiao, K.-F. & Rashvand, H.F. (2011). Integrating body language movements in augmented reality learning environment. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 1:1. (http://www.hcis-journal.com/content/1/1/1) Kesim, M. &Ozarslan,Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: current technologies and the potential for education, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297 – 302.
  5. Park, J.S. (2011) AR-Room: a rapid prototyping framework for augmented reality applications, Multimedia Tools Application, 55,725–746.
  6. Vankatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27 (3), 451-481.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts