You are here:

Assessing Student Transitions in an Online Learning Environment
ARTICLE

,

Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 1479-4403

Full Text

Abstract

Assessment surveys of students are often conducted in order to evaluate online learning activities. Most surveys measure responses to questions which are based on students' subjective impressions. The purpose of this study is to examine participants' assessments made during the transitional phase in an online learning environment which includes blended and fully online courses at a Japanese national university. Students were enrolled in two-unit Master's or Bachelor's degree courses which were taught by the same professor. The total number of students with valid survey data was 184 (92 Masters, 67 Bachelors for the blended learning course and 25 Bachelors for the fully online course). A survey questionnaire consisting of 10 questions measured the self-assessments of students' online learning experiences. Three factors were extracted. There are no significant differences in all factor scores between the beginnings and the ends of the courses. These results show the coherence of students' assessments during the course. The correlation coefficients of the first factor scores (e-learning evaluation) between the beginnings and the ends of the courses are not high, however (Masters: r=0.35, Bachelors for blended learning: r=0.46, and Bachelors for fully online: r=0.33). Therefore, some participants have changed their evaluations between the two surveys. When the differences in factor scores from the initial and final surveys are compared between students who rated the course highly at the beginning (high raters) and students who did not (low raters), the scores for the high raters decrease and the scores for the low raters increase. Also, the relationships between students' transitions and the metrics of their behaviour were investigated. (Contains 10 tables and 3 figures.)

Citation

Nakayama, M. & Yamamoto, H. (2011). Assessing Student Transitions in an Online Learning Environment. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 9(1), 75-86. Retrieved August 15, 2024 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Anderson, J., Brown, G., Spaeth, S. (2006) "Online Student Evaluations and Responses Rates Reconsidered", Innovate 2(6) http://www.innovateonline.info
  2. Coolican, H. (1994) Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology, Hodder & Stoughton, London, UK.
  3. Craig, A., Goold, A., Coldwell, J., Mustard, J. (2008) "Perceptions of Roles and Responsibilities inonline Learning: A Case Study", Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Object, Vol.4, 205-223.
  4. Deepwell, F. (2007) "Embedding Quality in e-Learning Implementation through Evaluation", Educational Technology& Society, 10(2), 34-43.
  5. Elton, L. (1993) University Teaching: a Professional Model for Quality. In R. Ellis ed. Quality Assurance for University Teaching (pp. 133-146), Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.
  6. Fujii Y. (2007) “Development of a Scale to Evaluate the Information Literacy Level of Young People-Comparison of Junior High School Students in Japan and Northern Europe”, Japan Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 30(4), pp.387-395.
  7. Haebara, T., Ichikawa, S., Shimoyama, H. Ed. (2001) Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology, Surveys, Experiments and Practices, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo Japan.
  8. Harrington, C.F., Reasons, S.G. (2005) "Online Student Evaluation of Teaching for Distance Education: A Perfect Match?", The Journal of Educators Online, 2(1), 1-11.
  9. Ishioka, T., Kameda, M. (2003) JESS: An Automated Japanese Essay Scoring System, Bulletin of the Computational Statistics of Japan, Vol.16, No.1, pp.3-19.
  10. Kaneko, M. (2009) “Gakusyu saseru” Daigaku (In Japanese), IDE, No.515, 4-10.
  11. Marginson, S. (2006) Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education, Higher Education, 52, 1-39.
  12. Nakayama, M., Yamamoto, H. & Santiago, R. (2006) “Investigating the Impact of Learner Characteristics on Blended Learning among Japanese Students”, Proceedings of ICEL 2006, pp.361-370, Academic
  13. Nakayama, M., Yamamoto, H. & Santiago, R. (2009) “Relationship between Learners' Characteristics and Learning Behavior of Japanese Students in Blended Learning Environment: A Three-Year Study”, Proceedings of ICEL 2009, pp.377-385, Academic Conferences.
  14. Palmer, S., Holt, D. (2009) "Staff and student perceptions of an online learning environment; Difference and development", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 366-381.
  15. Shimizu, Y., Maesako, T. (1988) “Description and Educational Evaluation of a TV Lecture System Between Two Campuses Connected by Optical Fiber Communication, IEEE Transaction on Education, Vol. 31, No. 3, 201-207.
  16. Watkins, R., Leigh, D., Foshay, R., Kaufman, R. (1998) “Kirkpatrick plus: Evaluation and continuous improvement with a community focus”, Educational Technology Research& Development, 46(4), pp.90-96.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links