Designing and Implementing Performance Technology for Teachers
ARTICLE
Joi Moore
CJLT Volume 30, Number 2, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education
Abstract
This paper synthesizes research findings from a performance analysis of teacher tasks and the implementation of performance technology. These findings are aligned with design and implementation theories to provide understanding of the complex factors and events that occur during the implementation process. The article describes the necessary elements and conditions for designing and implementing performance tools in school environments that will encourage usage, efficient performance, and positive attitudes. Two models provide a visual representation of causal relationships between the implementation factors and the technology user. Although the implementation process can become complex because of the simultaneous events and phases, it can be properly managed through good communication and strategic involvement of teachers during the design and development process. The models may be able to assist technology designers and advocates with presenting innovations to teachers who are frequently asked to try technical solutions for performance support or improvement.
Citation
Moore, J. & Moore, J. (2004). Designing and Implementing Performance Technology for Teachers. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 30(2),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved August 5, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/43065/.
References
View References & Citations Map- Barrow, C. (1992). Implementing an executive information system: Seven steps for success. In H.J. Watson, R.K. Rainer, & G. Houdeshel (Eds.), Executive information systems: Emergence, development, impact, (pp. 107-116). New York: Wiley.
- Berry, B. & Ginsberg, R. (1991). Effective schools and teachers' professionalism: Educational policy at a crossroads. In J. Bliss, W. Firestone, & C. Richards (Eds.) Rethinking effective schools: Research and practice (pp. 138-153). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
- Forman, D.C., & Kaplan, S.J. (1994). Continuous learning environments: Online performance support systems. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 8(2), 6-12.
- Gery, G.J. (1995). Attributes and behavior of performance centered systems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(1), 47-93.
- Gould, J. (1988). How to design usable systems. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. North Holland: Elsevier Science.
- Hall, G.E., & Hord, S.M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
- Honey, M., McMillan, G., & Carrigg, F. (2000). Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and present. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 5-14.
- Hubbard, L.A., & Ottoson, J.M. (1997). When a bottom-up innovation meets itself as a top-down policy. Science Communication, 19(1), 41-55.
- Huling-Austin (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173-180.
- Jones, P. (1994). Education as an information based organization. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 728)
- Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Meyer, M., Johnson, J.D., & Ethington, C. (1997). Contrasting attributes of preventive health innovations. Journal of Communication, 47(2), 112-131.
- Moore, J.L., & Orey, M. (2001). The implementation of an electronic performance support system for teachers: An examination of usage, performance, and attitudes. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(1), 26-56.
- Moore, J.L., Orey, M. & Hardy, J.V. (2000). The development of an electronic performance support tool for teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8 (1), 29-52.
- Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Reichardt, C.S. & Cook, T.D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T.D. Cook and C.S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp.7-32). Thousand Oaks,
- Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4 th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
- Rummler, G.A., & Brache, A.P. (1992). Transforming organizations through human performance technology. In H.D. Stolovitch, & E. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology: A comprehensive guide for analyzing and solving performance problems in organizations (pp. 32-49) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Schramm, W. (1954). The process and effects of mass communication. Urbana: University of University of Illinois Press.
- Stolovitch, H.D. & Keeps, E. (1992). What is human performance technology? In H.D. Stolovitch, & E. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology: A comprehensive guide for analyzing and solving performance problems in organizations (pp. 3-13). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Surry, D.W., & Farquhar, J.D. (1997). Diffusion theory and instructional technology. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology 2(1). Retrieved December 1, 2003 from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/docs/old/vol2no1/article2.htm
- Tripp, S.D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31-44.
- Van Melle, E, Cimellaro, L, & Shulha, L. (2003). A dynamic framework to guide the implementation and evaluation of educational technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 8(3), 267-285.
- Whitney, D.M., & Lehman, J.D. (1990). A study of one school system's implementation of a commercial computer managed instruction program. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(1), 49-63.
- Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
- Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J.L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References