You are here:

Vodcasts and Captures: Using Multimedia to Improve Student Learning in Introductory Biology
ARTICLE

, Research & Evaluation, Office of Information Technology, University of Minnesota, United States ; , Biology Program, University of Minnesota, United States ; , Milwaukee Public Schools, United States

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 20, Number 1, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This study investigated the use of multimedia materials to enhance student learning in a large, introductory biology course. Two sections of this course were taught by the same instructor in the same semester. In one section, video podcasts or “vodcasts” were created which combined custom animation and video segments with music and faculty voiceover, and which were designed to address those topics known to be difficult for biology students. In the other section, “class captures” were produced for each class session which combined the output of the classroom’s digital projector with a recording of the instructor’s voice. Both types of multimedia were made available to students online through the Blackboard-Vista course management system.

Student reception of the custom vodcasts was more enthusiastic than reception of the class captures. Additionally, after controlling for potential confounding variables including students’ overall GPA, major, sex, ethnic background, high school rank, year in school, composite ACT scores, and initial level of evolution knowledge, it was found that students who used the custom vodcasts achieved significantly higher scores (9.4%, or 2/3 of a standard deviation) on an end-of-term test of evolution knowledge than students who used the class captures. Students in the two sections of the class achieved statistically equivalent final grades in the course, however. It is argued that vodcasts are a more effective way of utilizing multimedia in large classes than class captures due to their targeting of known student problems in the course material and to their better implementation of established principles for the design of effective multimedia resources.

Citation

Walker, J.d., Cotner, S. & Beermann, N. (2011). Vodcasts and Captures: Using Multimedia to Improve Student Learning in Introductory Biology. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 20(1), 97-111. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 1, 2024 from .

© 2011 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ashcraft, M.H. (1989). Human memory and cognition. Glenview, Il.: Scott, Foresman. Atkinson, R.C. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes, In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning
  2. Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C, Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P.A., Fiset, M., and Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379-439.
  3. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
  4. Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
  5. Clark, R. C. (2002). The new ISD: Applying cognitive strategies to instructional design. Performance Improvement 41, 8-15.
  6. Gagne, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.
  7. Mautone, P. D. & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 377-389.
  8. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Mayer, R.E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64-73.
  10. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
  11. Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2000a). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724733.
  12. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices on online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online
  13. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
  14. Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 2, no page references.
  15. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Pronin, E., & Kugler, M.B. (2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 4, 565-578.
  17. Smith, S., Salaway, G., & Borreson Caruso, J. (2009). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2009 (Research Study, Vol. 6). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved March 3, 2010 from http://www.educause.edu/ecar.
  18. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
  19. Walker, J.D. & Jorn, L. (2009). Millenial students at the University of Minnesota. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Office of Information Technology.
  20. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H.S. (2005) What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836-1884.
  21. Zhu, L. & Grabowski, B.L. (2006). Web-based animation or static graphics: Is the extra cost of animation worth it? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 329-47.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.