![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/CITE.jpg)
Using Technology Tools to Engage Students with Multiple Learning Styles in a Constructivist Learning Environment
Article
Pamela Solvie, Molly Kloek, University of Minnesota Morris, United States
CITE Journal Volume 7, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This research study investigated the use of technology tools to support constructivist learning experiences in a preservice teacher education reading methods course. Learning opportunities based on Kolb's learning styles model were used to support understanding of course content in the constructivist environment. Technology tools were used during class presentations to communicate, scaffold, and clarify course concepts and content while engaging students with information. Technology was used outside of class as a collaboration tool in mediating and negotiating learning between the instructor and students as well as between students and students. In addition to demonstration and application of reading methods, students' perceptions of their learning experience and understanding of course content were considered in analyzing the effectiveness of technology used to address multiple learning styles in a constructivist environment.
Citation
Solvie, P. & Kloek, M. (2007). Using Technology Tools to Engage Students with Multiple Learning Styles in a Constructivist Learning Environment. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 7-27. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved August 11, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22811/.
© 2007 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). Search for understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Bruner, J., & Olson, D. (1973). Learning through experience and learning through media. Prospects, 3(1), 20-38.
- Chen, C., Toh, S., & Ismail, W. (2005). Are learning styles relevant to virtual reality? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 123-141.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Simon& Schuster (The Free Press).
- Everitt, B.S., & Dunn, G. (2001). Applied multivariate analysis (2nd ed.). London: Arnold Press.
- Gagnon, G.W., & Collay, M. (2001). Designing for learning: Six elements in constructivist classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
- Gee, J. (2000). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge. 23
- Harris, R.C., Reutzel, D.R., & Cooter, R.B. (2004). Model lessons for literacy instruction. New York: Pearson.
- Howe, K.R., & Berv, J. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues: 99th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- InTime. (1999). Integrating new technologies into the methods of teaching. Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://www.intime.uni.edu
- Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
- Kolb, D.A., & Kolb, A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory-Version 3.1: 2005 Technical specifications. Boston, MA: The HayGroup.
- Larsen, R.E. (1992). Relationship of learning style to the effectiveness and acceptance of interactive video instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 19(11), 17-21.
- Luke, C. (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope, & M. Kalantzis (Eds.). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the Design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
- McCarty, L.P., & Schwandt, T. (2000). Seductive illusions: Von Glaserfeld and Gergen on epistemology and education. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues 99th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Moore, S.D., & McCabe, G.P. (2004). Introduction to the practice of statistics (5th ed.). New York: Freeman Press.
- Murrell, P., & Claxton, C. (1987, September). Experiential learning theory as a guide for effective teaching. Counselor Education and Supervision, 4-14.
- Pittman, J., Rutz, E., & Elkins, V. (2006). Technology-enabled content in engineering technology and applied science curriculum: Implications for online content development in teacher education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(1), 32-56.
- Street, B. (1995). Social literacies. New York: Longman.
- Taylor, S., & Hsueh, Y. (2005). Implementing a constructivist approach in higher education through technology. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26, 127132.
- Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Deci, E., & Sheldon, K. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents 24 and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260.
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Author Note: Pamela Solvie University of Minnesota Morris psolvie@morris.umn.edu Molly Kloek University of Minnesota Morris kloe0038@morris.umn.edu 25
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Enhancing the Flipped Classroom Experience with the Aid of Inclusive Design
Jorge Reyna, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Australia; Yvonne C Davila & Peter Meier, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2016 (Jun 28, 2016) pp. 1795–1807
-
Exploring a Framework to Design Desktop Recording Lectures (DRLs)
Jorge Reyna, Macquarie University, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015 (Jun 22, 2015) pp. 1302–1311
-
How Schools Are Meeting State Legal Mandates To Provide Online Education
Mark Deschaine, Central Michigan University, United States; Robert Leneway, Western Michigan University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 1634–1640
-
Editorial: Approaching Technology in English Education from a Different Perspective
Melanie Shoffner, Purdue University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 13, No. 2 (June 2013) pp. 99–104
-
Teaching for Success: Technology and Learning Styles in Preservice Teacher Education
Pamela Solvie, Northwestern College, United States; Engin Sungur, University of Minnesota, Morris, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 12, No. 1 (March 2012) pp. 6–40
-
Teaching for Success: Linking Technology and Learning Styles in Preservice Teacher Education
Pamela Solvie & Lindsey Senske, University of Minnesota, Morris, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 2681–2684
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.