You are here:

A Comparative Study of Computer Conferencing and Face-to-Face Communications in Systems Design
Article

, , Southern Illinois University, United States

Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 13, Number 3, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of computer conferencing and face-to-face communications to support the work of student teams in a systems analysis project. The study compares the differences in decision quality associated with the projects accomplished by these teams, each team's confidence in the group decision, and each team's satisfaction with the overall decision process. The research questions were: (a) will the computer conferencing groups produce solutions of higher decision quality, as measured by group scores for decision quality, analytical strength, technical strength, research base for drawing conclusions, and the effectiveness of the group presentation; and (b) will the face-to-face groups feel greater confidence in the group decision and greater satisfaction with the group decision process, because of the personal relationships that have been developed, as measured by confidence in the group decision, satisfaction with the group decision process, and peer evaluations of participation of their teammates and effectiveness of their teammates? Based upon the findings, computer conferencing afforded opportunities for handling evaluative tasks more effectively than face-to-face meetings. Computer conferencing offers the benefits of producing better decisions because of broader participation, expression of a wider range of opinions, and greater analysis. Computer conferencing can lower time pressures and create the psychological distance among participants needed to engage in more open, candid exchanges of opinions. Its shortcomings are the time it takes to exchange messages, the increased difficulty of coordinating and clarifying ideas, and the increased time it takes to develop a consensus and to arrive at a decision.

Citation

Sumner, M. & Hostetler, D. (2002). A Comparative Study of Computer Conferencing and Face-to-Face Communications in Systems Design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 277-291. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 11, 2024 from .

© 2002 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adrianson, L., & Hjelmquist, E. (1991). Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behavior and Information Technology, 10(4), 281-296.
  2. Couger, J.D., Higgins, L.F., & McIntyre, S.C. (1993). Unstructured creativity in information systems organizations, MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 375397.
  3. Gallupe, R.B., & McKeen, J.D. (1990). Enhancing computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face versus remote meetings. Information and Management, 18(1), 1-13.
  4. George, J.F., Easton, G.K., Nunamaker, J.F., & Northcraft, G.B. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 394-415.
  5. Hiltz, S., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision-making, I: Communications process and outcome in face-to-face computer conferences. Human Communication Research, 13(2), 225252.
  6. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 157-187.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read