You are here:

DIANA Model - Dialogical Authentic Learning on the Net
PROCEEDINGS

, , Häme Polytechnic / Tampere University, Finland

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-48-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Learning on the net is a demanding and complicated challenge in many ways. Many researches report that collaboration, conversation and problem solving don't succeed as expected in netlearning environment. This paper presents the dialogic and authentic model for the learning and teaching on the net. The main idea of the research project was to find out some pedagogical cornerstones of learning and teaching on the net. The results of these studies lead to the model, where dialogue and authenticity are the crucial points. It was named DIANA (Dialogical Authentic Netlearning Activity). The model was developed in the contexts of teacher training and professional education in Finland. The DIANA model was also tested in practice in different contexts, and the results showed that it is difficult to manage dialogic and authentic learning on the net. This research was one part of the National Strategy's goals in order to provide concepts for network-based education in Finland.

Citation

Enqvist, J. & Aarnio, H. (2003). DIANA Model - Dialogical Authentic Learning on the Net. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2090-2095). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aarnio, H. (1999). In Search of Dialogue: Developing Dialogue for Communication and Information Techno logical Environment (in Finnish). University of Tampere, Finland. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 676. Doctoral dis-s ertation.
  2. Anderson, J.R., Greeno, J.G., Reder, L.M., & Simon, H.A. (2000). Perspectives on Learning, Thinking, and Activ-ity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11–13.
  3. Bakhtin, M.M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ed. And trans. Caryl Emerson. Theory and History of Literature 8. 1963 (Russian). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  4. Bielaczyc, K. (2001). Designing Social Infrastructure: The Challenge of Building Computer-Supported Learning Communities. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on Co mpu te r-supported collaborative learning: Proceedings of the First European Conference of Computer-supported Collabo rative Learning. McLuhan Institute: University of Maastricht, 106–114. Available: http://www.mmi.unimaas.nl/euro-cscl/Papers/15.doc Bohm D. (1996). On Dialogue. London: Routledge.
  5. Bohm, D., Factor, D. & Garrett, P. (1991). Dialogue-A Proposal. Available: http://www.muc.de/~heuvel/dialogue/dialogue_proposal.html.
  6. Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological Theory and the Design of In novative Learning Enviro n ments: On Procedures, Principles, and Systems. In Schauble, L. & Glaser, R. (eds.): Innovations in Learning: New Environments for Education. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 289–325.
  7. Enqvist, J. (1999). Passion for Learning in Internet Environment: Developing Net Competence in Vocational Pre-Service Teacher Education (in Finnish). University of Tampere, Finland. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 677. Doctoral dissertation.
  8. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.
  9. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437– 469.
  10. Hara, N., Bonk, C.J., & Angeli, C. (1998). Content Analysis of Online Discussion in an Applied Educational Ps ycho logy Course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152. Available: http://crlt.indiana.edu/publications/techreport.pdf Hewitt, J., & Tevlops, C. (1999). An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing thereads. In C. Hoad ley (Ed.), Proceedings of CSCL '99: The Third International Conference on Computer Support for Co llaborative Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum , 232–241.
  11. Isaacs, W.N. (1996). The Process and Potential of Dialogue in Social Change. Educational Technology 36 (1), 2030.
  12. Isaacs, W.N. (1999). Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life. New York: Doubleday.
  13. Jenlink, P. & Carr, A.A. (1996). Conversation as a Medium for Change in Education. Educational technology 36 (1), 31-38.
  14. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture of everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge Un i-versity Press.
  15. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Lipponen, L. (2001). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: From Promises to Reality. University of Turku, Finland. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Series B. Humaniora 245. Doctoral dissertation.
  17. Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. Available: http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/papers/ref/pdf/Reeves.pdf Rogoff, B (1991). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford Univer-sity Press.
  18. Salomon, G. & Perkins, D.N. (1996). Learning in Wonderland: What Do Computers Really Offer Education? In Kerr, S.T. (ed.) Technology and the Future of Schooling. Ninety-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE), Part II. Chicago Press, 111–130.
  19. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE Project: Trying to Bring the Classroom into W orld 3. In McGilly, K. (ed.) Classroom lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory & Classroom Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 201–228.
  20. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educa-tional Researcher, 28(7), 4–14.
  21. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4– 13.
  22. Shaffer, D.W. & Resnick, M. (1999). "Thick" Authenticity: New Media and Authentic Learning. Journal of Intera c-tive Le arning Research, 10(2), 195–215.
  23. Stahl, G. (1999). Reflections on WebGuide. Seven issues for the next generation of collaborative knowledgebuilding environments. In C. Hoadley (Ed.), Proceedings of CSCL '99: The Third International Confe rence on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 600–610.
  24. Taylor, C. (1992). The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge Massachussets: Harvard University Press.
  25. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge Massachussets: MIT Press.
  26. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge Massachussets: Harvard University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.