You are here:

I have TPCK! – What does that mean? Examining the External Validity of TPCK Self-Reports.
PROCEEDINGS

, Knowledge Media Research Center, Germany ; , Stanford University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Two studies using a TPCK self-rated knowledge scale provide insights into the construct being measured by that scale. These validity studies from two different populations – accomplished teachers in the United States and pre-service teachers in Germany – examine the correlations between TPCK and a variety of knowledge, belief, and attitude variables. Both studies show the TPCK measure correlating most strongly with personal experience and pro-technology attitudes, and less strongly with objective knowledge measures.

Citation

Krauskopf, K. & Forssell, K. (2013). I have TPCK! – What does that mean? Examining the External Validity of TPCK Self-Reports. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2190-2197). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 6, 2024 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Archambault, L.M., & Barnett, J.H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers& Education, 55(4), 1656 – 1662. DOI:10.1016/J.compedu.2010.07.009
  2. Author. (2011).
  3. Barron, B.J. (2004) Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 1-36.
  4. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., Ho, H.N.J., & Tsai, C.C. (2012). Examining preservice teachers’ perceived knowledge of TPACK and cyberwellness through structural equation modeling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1000 – 1019.
  5. Educational Testing Services. (2006). The proper use of the Praxis Series and related assessments. Retrieved February 11, 2010, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/PRAXIS/pdf/guidelines.pdf Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research& Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  6. Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy. Social Science Computer Review. 23(3), 371-379.
  7. Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010). Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Assessment Rubric. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Vol. 2010, pp. 3833 – 3840). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from
  8. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers& Education, 49(3), 740 – 762.
  9. Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2012). Developing a TPCK-SRL assessment scheme for conceptually advancing technology in education. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 1 – 8. Doi:10.1016/J.stueduc.2012.03.001Krauskopf,K.,Zahn,C., & Hesse, F.W (in preparation). Supporting the construction of mental models of video tools. An experimental approach to the cognitive transformation of technological and pedagogical knowledge.
  10. Krauskopf, K., Zahn, C., & Hesse, F.W. (2012). Leveraging the affordances of Youtube: The role of pedagogical knowledge and mental models of technology functions for lesson planning with technology. Computers& Education, 58(4), 1194 – 1206. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2011.12.010
  11. Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Das Kompetenzmodell von COACTIV [The competence model of the COACTIV project.]. In Mareike Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkrä ften: Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV (pp. 29 – 53).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections

Pages You've Visited

Abstracts