You are here:

Student Persistence and Attrition in an Online M. S. Program: Implications for Program Design
ARTICLE

, University of Tennessee in Knoxville, United States ; , University of Tennessee, United States

International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper describes results from a case study that focuses on the initial implementation of a new, online instructional program, the WebIT M.S. in Instructional Technology, offered at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville during 2008-2010. Survey data were collected from two groups of students: a self-selected sample of those students who dropped out of the WebIT program within the first year (the DROPPER-respondents), and the students who successfully completed the WebIT program in Spring 2010 (COMPLETERS). These two groups of students were compared in an attempt to identify possible differences that would help program faculty make future admission decisions; and, to identify program design characteristics for possible program revision. Eleven findings are reported and discussed. These findings may be of value to others currently involved in the delivery of an online program or those who may be interested in developing a new online program.

Citation

Waugh, M. & Su-Searle, J. (2014). Student Persistence and Attrition in an Online M. S. Program: Implications for Program Design. International Journal on E-Learning, 13(1), 101-121. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-14.
  2. Barnett, B. G., Basom, M. R., Yerkes, D. M., & Norris, C. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255-282.
  3. Bean, J. P. (1990). Why students leave: Insights from research. In D. Hossler, J. P. Bean, & Associates, The Strategic Management of College Enrollments (pp. 170– 185). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Bean, J., & Metzner, B. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485–540.
  5. Berge, Z. & Huang, Y. (2004). A model for sustainable student retention: A holistic perspective on the student dropout problem with special attention to e-learning. Distance Online Symposium, 13(5), The American Center for the Study of Distance Education.
  6. Burnett, P. C. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(1), 46-52.
  7. Chandler, M., Levin, J. A., & Levin, S. R. (2002). The evolution of an online community of distributed learners/teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
  8. Cole, R. A. (Ed.) (2000). Issues in web-based pedagogy: a critical primer. London: Greenwood Press.
  9. Cope, R., & Hannah, W. (1975). Revolving college doors: The causes and consequences of dropping out, stopping out, and transferring. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Diaz, D. P. (2002). Online drop rates revisited. The Technology Source. Retrieved from http://technologysource.org ./article/online_drop_rates_revisited
  11. Gibson, C. C. (1998). The distance learner’s academic self-concept. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (pp. 65-76). Madison, WI: Atwood.
  12. Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the course: A study in online student satisfaction and retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter94/herbert94.htm
  13. Knoell, D. M. (1966). A critical review of research on the college dropout. In L. A. Pervin, L. E. Reik, & W. Dalrymple (Eds), The college dropout and the utilization of talent (pp. 63-81). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  14. Kowch, E., & Schwier, R. (1997). Building learning communities with technology. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED408857)
  15. Levin, S. R., Levin, J. A., & Chandler, M. (2001). Social and organizational Factors in creating and maintaining effective online learning environments. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle.
  16. Levin, S. R., & Waddoups, G. L. (2000). CTER online: providing highly interactive and effective online learning environments. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Chesapeake, VA.
  17. LimeSurvey. (2003). Lime Survey Open Source Survey Administration Software [Computer Software] Retrieved from http://www.limesurvey.org/
  18. Merriam, S. B. (1998) . Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Moodle Trust. (1999). Moodle Learning Management System [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://moodle.org/
  20. Moxley, D., Najor-Durack, A. & Dumbrigue, C. (2001). Keeping Students in Higher Education. Successful Practices and Strategies for retention. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.
  21. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities. Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, CA.
  22. Pascarella, E.T. (Eds.) (1982). Studying student attrition. New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Patterson, B., & McFadden, C. (2009). Attrition in online and campus degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer122/patterson112.html
  24. Peelo, M. & Wareham, T. (Eds.) (2002). Failing Students in Higher Education. SRHE/ Open University Press: Buckingham.
  25. Pervin, L., Reik, L., & Dalrymple, W. (1966). The college dropout and the utilization of talent. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  26. Ross, L.R., & Powell, R. (1990). Relationships between gender and success in distance education courses: A preliminary investigation. Research in Distance Education, 2(2), 10-11.
  27. Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 49(4), 35–50.
  28. Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet & Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16.
  29. Stake, R. M. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  30. Terenzini, P. T. (1982). Designing attrition studies. In E. T. Pascarella (Ed.), Studying student attrition. New Directions for Institutional Research (pp. 55-71). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  31. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.
  32. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  33. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  34. Tisdell, E. J., Stohschen, G. I. E., Carver, M. L., Corrigan, P., Nash, J., Nelson, M., Royer, M., Strom-Mackey, R., & O’Conner, M. (2004). Cohort learning online in graduate higher education: constructing knowledge in cyber community. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 115-127.
  35. Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 105118.
  36. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  37. Yorke, M. (1999). Leaving Early: Undergraduate Non-completion in Higher Education. London: Falmer Press.
  38. Yorke, M. (2001). Telling it as it is? Massification, performance indicators and the press. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(1), 57-68.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.