Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives of Their Faculty’s Web 2.0 Use: Trends from 2008 to 2012
PROCEEDINGS
Joan Hughes, Sa Liu, Mihyun Lim, Learning Technologies, College of Education, University of Texas at Austin, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of a study that analyzed preservice teachers’ perspectives on (a) their faculty’s use of Web 2.0 technologies versus traditional classroom technology use and (b) their descriptions of how faculty used the technology. Using descriptive survey methodology, results indicates that most of the traditional technology use is significantly decreasing. However, results also revealed that the use of Web 2.0 activities has not changed significantly, with the exception of classroom activities using blogs and video creation.
Citation
Hughes, J., Liu, S. & Lim, M. (2015). Preservice Teachers’ Perspectives of Their Faculty’s Web 2.0 Use: Trends from 2008 to 2012. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2340-2346). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 6, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/150607/.
© 2015 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., Lee, J.K., & Fox, D.L. (2009). Using Video Editing to Cultivate Novice Teachers' Practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 73-94.
- Cervetti, G., Damico, J., & Pearson, P.D. (2007). Multiple literacies, new literacies, and teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 378-386.
- Coutinho, C., & Bottentuit Junior, J. (2007). Collaborative learning using wiki: A pilot study with master students in educational technology in Portugal. In C. Franklin, T. & Van Harmelen, M. (2007) Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. JISC, Bristol.
- Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Changes without reform in American Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. (1999). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to do. Philadelphia: CPRE, National Commission on Teaching for America’s Future.
- DeCuir-Gunby, J.T., Marshall, P.L., & McCulloch, A.W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136-155.
- Georgina, D.A., & Olson, M.R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty selfperceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1-8.
- Gillmor, D. (2004). We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people. Sebastopol. CA: O’Reilly Media.
- Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
- Heafner, T.L., & Friedman, A.M. (2008). Wikis and constructivism in secondary social studies: Fostering a deeper understanding. Computers in the Schools, 25, 288–302.
- Hew, K.F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 662–676.
- Hew, K.F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–
- Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.henryjenkins.org/2006/10/confronting_the_challenges_of.html
- Leu, D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L.A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D.E. Alvermann, N.J. Unrau & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (Vol. 6th, pp. 1150-1181). Newark, DE: International
- Madden, M., & Fox, S. (2006). Riding the waves of “Web 2.0.” Pew Internet& American Life Project. 1–6.
- McManus, R. (2005, August). Web 2.0 is not about version numbers or betas. Read/WriteWeb. Retrieved July 21, 2012, from http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_is_not_a.php Montgomerie& J. Seale (Eds.),
- Oliver, K. (2007). Design and development of a faculty technology practices directory. Educause Quarterly, 30(4), 38-47.
- Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C.E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow's teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 863-870.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Salaway, G., Caruso, J.B., Nelson, M.R., Ellison, N.B. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. Educause center for applied research. Retreived from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0808/rs/ers0808w.pdf
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References