An Integrated Multimedia Learning Model vs. The Traditional Face-to-Face Learning Model: An Examination of College Economics Classes

Purchase or Subscription required for access

Purchase individual articles and papers

PayPal Logo

Receive full-text access to individual articles for $9.95 USD each.

Use PayPal button to purchase PDF copy of paper (16 pages)

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe and receive access to 100,000+ documents, for only $19/month (or $150/year).

Already have access?

Individual Subscription

If you have an individual subscription, sign in here for access

Institutional Subscription

You don't appear to be accessing the site through a subscribing institution (your IP address is 3.23.102.99).

If your university, college, or library subscribes to LearnTechLib, you may be able access full text articles through a login page.

You can search for your instition by name or by location.

Login via Institution

Authors

Barbara Son, Mark Simonian, California State University at Los Angeles, United States

JEMH Volume 25, Number 4, October 2016 ISSN 1055-8896

Abstract

Multimedia learning tools can assist and help motivate students by supplementing traditional teaching modalities with learner-centered learning through application and practice. The overall effectiveness of multimedia learning has been documented (Son & Simonian, 2013; Son & Goldstone, 2012; Zhang, 2005). How are effective multimedia learning tools best integrated into the instruction of challenging courses, such as mathematics and economics courses? To answer this question, first, we present an Integrated Multimedia Learning Model which overcomes crucial weaknesses of the traditional face-to-face learning model. Then, we then test our hypothesis about the effectiveness of an Integrated Multimedia Learning Model through an examination of the outcomes of both learning models in college economics classes. In sum, we find that students who were presented with complex material through an Integrated Multimedia Learning Model achieved statistically higher performances than students who were presented the same complex material through a traditional learning model. Finally, we consider the implications of this demonstrable improvement in student achievement, discussing the most effective uses of our Integrated Multimedia Learning Model.

Citation

Son, B. & Simonian, M. (2016). An Integrated Multimedia Learning Model vs. The Traditional Face-to-Face Learning Model: An Examination of College Economics Classes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 25(4), 305-321. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 11, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/129916.