The Effects of Argumentation Scaffolds on Argumentation and Problem Solving
ARTICLE
Kyoo-Lak Cho, David H. Jonassen
Educational Technology Research and Development Volume 50, Number 3, ISSN 1042-1629
Abstract
This study examined the use of online argumentation scaffolds to engage and support coherent argumentation. Participants were students in an undergraduate economics course. Results showed that providing a constraint-based argumentation scaffold during group problem-solving activities increased the generation of coherent arguments and resulted in more problem-solving actions during collaborative group discussions. (Contains 38 references.) (MES)
Citation
Cho, K.L. & Jonassen, D.H. (2002). The Effects of Argumentation Scaffolds on Argumentation and Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22. Retrieved August 5, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95370/.
ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
Keywords
Cited By
View References & Citations Map-
Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: The effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level
Joo Yeun Kim, Center for Teaching and Learning; Kyu Yon Lim, Department of Educational Technology
Computers & Education Vol. 138, No. 1 (September 2019) pp. 116–129
-
Twitter vs. Facebook: Using Social Media to Promote Collaborative Argumentation in an Online Classroom
Marissa Owens & E. Michael Nussbaum, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2016 (Nov 14, 2016) pp. 1221–1234
-
The Twitter Top 5, PLN 3-Point Reflections, The Great Debate, and Deconstructing Monument Valley: Innovative Activities in Online and Blended Graduate Courses
Julia Parra, New Mexico State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 755–761
-
Learning Outcomes and Experiences while Learning with an Argumentative Agent
Xuehong Tao & Nicola Yelland, Victoria University, Australia; Zhiqi Shen, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 2312–2322
-
Enhancing Learners’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Discussions: Implementation of Audio- and Video-Based Argumentation Activity
Eunjung Oh, Georgia College and State University, United States; Hyun Song Kim, The University of Georgia, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 2031–2036
-
Designing Asynchronous Online Discussion Environments: A Review of Current Research
Fei Gao, Bowling Green State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 345–349
-
Impact of computer-supported scaffolding on argumentation
Hyun Kim, University of Georgia, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2012 (Jun 26, 2012) pp. 946–949
-
Using Online Mapping Tool in Problem Solving Activity
Hua Bai, Northeastern Illinois University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 1648–1650
-
Using On-Line Technologies And Handhelds To Scaffold Students’ Argumentation In Science
Maria Evagorou, King's College, London & CARDET, Cyprus; Lucy Avraamidou, University of Nicosia, Cyprus & CARDET, Cyprus; Charalambos Vrasidas, CARDET & University of Nicosia, Cyprus, Cyprus
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 5212–5217
-
Thinking Sociologically: Problem-Centered Learning to Foster Argumentation
Holly Henry, University of Missouri Columbia, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2009 (Jun 22, 2009) pp. 2822–2827
-
A Review of Studies on Collaborative Concept Mapping: What Have We Learned About the Technique and What Is Next?
Hong Gao, E Shen, Susan Losh & Jeannine Turner, Florida State University, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 18, No. 4 (October 2007) pp. 479–492
-
A Case-Based E-Learning Environment for Facilitating Ill-Structured Problem Solving Skills: Classroom Management
Ikseon Choi & Kyunghwa Lee, The University of Georgia, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 1894–1901
-
An Enhanced Model for Computer-supported Problem-based Learning
Douglas Williams, Yuxin Ma, Louise Prejean, Sally Dobyns, Steven Feist & Michele Feist, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2006 (June 2006) pp. 2460–2465
-
Cognitive Load Considerations for Scaffolding in Computer-Based Collaborative Learning Environments
Wayne Slabon, Florida State University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2006 (June 2006) pp. 1317–1324
-
A Review of Research Methods for Assessing Content of Computer-Mediated Discussion Forums
Rose Marra, University of Missouri, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 17, No. 3 (July 2006) pp. 243–267
-
Investigation of the “Convince Me” Computer Environment as a Tool for Critical Argumentation about Public Policy Issues
Stephen T. Adams, California State University, Long Beach, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 14, No. 3 (July 2003) pp. 263–283
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.