You are here:

Fluidity in the Networked Society--Self-Initiated learning as a Digital Literacy Competence
ARTICLE

Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 1479-4403

Full Text

Abstract

In the globalized economies e-permeation has become a basic condition in our everyday lives. ICT can no longer be understood solely as artefacts and tools and computer-related literacy are no longer restricted to the ability to operate digital tools for specific purposes. The network society, and therefore also eLearning are characterized by fluidity and the key competence for social actors in this ever changing e-permeated environment is the ability to cope with change--or Castells' conceptualisation "self-programming". Castells' theory has influenced international definitions of future key competencies. Both lifelong learning and digital literacy understood as "bildung" have emerged as central for the definitions of and standards for future key competencies. However, definitions and standards only tell us about the desired destination and outcome of digital competence building. They tell us nothing about how we may get there. In the educational system ICT and e-learning are becoming an everyday condition and the basic challenge for the educational system is twofold: 1) The actually making of digital literate and self-programming social actors--students and teachers; and 2) How to develop adequate designs for teaching and learning for that purpose. We need research that aims to describe the phenomenology of acquiring digital literacy and self-programming in order to be able to identify relevant learning objectives and scaffolding. Findings from such studies are expected to be relevant for eLearning scenarios as well as for ICT and designs for learning in general. This paper presents a case study that aimed to explore the phenomenological appearance of self-programming as agency and learning among postgraduate students who participated in a specially designed eLearning workshop in the autumn 2009. The findings relate to both the individual and collaborative barriers and proactive strategies that come into play among the students. Drawing on the findings, it is argued that the presented workshop design contributes to the networked society's design for ICT, teaching and learning, as the design--at least for this small group of students--have proved to support the development of digital self-programming as a sustainable competence. In the autumn 2010 the study will be expanded to a larger group of students. (Contains 6 figures and 1 table.)

Citation

Levinsen, K.T. (2011). Fluidity in the Networked Society--Self-Initiated learning as a Digital Literacy Competence. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 9(1), 52-62. Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Breivik, P.S. (2005) “21st century learning and information literacy”, Change. Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp 20-27.
  2. Buckingham, D. (2003) Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press
  3. Castells, M. (2000) “Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 51, Issue No. 1, pp 5–24.
  4. Dede, C. (2005): “Planning for Neo-Millennial Learning Styles”, Educause Quarterly, No.1, pp 7-12.
  5. Dreyfus, H.L. & Dreyfus, S. (1988) Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. N.Y., Simon and Schuster.
  6. Elearning Europa (2005) A European Framework for Digital Literacy. [Online] H http://wwwHelearningeuropa.info/directory/index.php?page=doc & Doc_id=6007 & Doclng=6
  7. European Commission (2003) eLearning: Better eLearning for Europe, Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Www.ejel org Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 9 Issue 1 2011
  8. EVA (2009) It i skolen – rapport, ©2009 Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut. G8 (2006) G8 World Summit in St.Petersburg, July 16, 2006, [Online] http://en.g8russia.ru/docs/12.html.
  9. Jewett, C. And Kress, G. (2003) Multimodal Literacy, New York: Peter Lang.
  10. Katz, I.R. (2007) "Beyond Technical Competence: Literacy in Information and Communication Technology”, [online] An Issue Paper from ETS, [Online] http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/ICT_Literacy/pdf/ICT_Beyond_Technical_Competence.pdf
  11. Levinsen, K. (2006) “Watch out– the Power Users are coming”, Electronic Journal of E-learning, vol. 5, issue 1, pp. 79–86.
  12. Levinsen, K. (2009) "Learning for the Networked Society– Future-Oriented Competencies and the Emergence of the new Learner”, Proceedings of ECEL 2009, The 8th European Conference on e-Learning held at the University of Bari, Italy on 29-30 October 2009, P. 325 – 332.
  13. Levinsen, K. And Sørensen, B.H. (2008) It, faglig læring og pædagogisk videnledels (ICT, subject learning and pedagogic knowledge management), Research Report, DPU.
  14. Martin, A. (2006) ”A European framework for digital literacy”, Digital Kompetanse, nr. 2, pp 151-161.
  15. Malyn-Smith, J. (2004) “Power Users of Technology-Who are they? Where are they going? Why does it matter?”, [online] UN Chronicle Online Edition, issue 2, pp 58, [Online]
  16. Oblinger, D. & Oblinger, J. Eds. (2005) “Educating the Net Generation”, [online] EDUCAUSE, e-book, www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/
  17. OECD (2001), Meeting of the OECD education ministers, Paris, 3-4 April 2001, [Online] http://www.ecd.org/dataoecd/40/8/1924078.pdf,
  18. Polanyi, M. (1968) “Logic and Psychology”, Journal of the American Psychological Association, Inc., vol. 23, pp 27-43.
  19. Raffle, H.S., Parkes, A.J. & Ishii, H. (2004) ”Topobo: A Constructive Assembly System with Kinetic Memory”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria, pp 647 –
  20. 654.Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
  21. Rychen, D. And Salganik, L. (2003) Key Competencies for a Successful Life and Well-Functioning Society. Hogrefe & Huber, Cambridge MA.
  22. Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith
  23. Sørensen, B.H. (1999) Projektarbejde fra begyndertrinnet – medier og formidling (Project Work for young Children– media and mediation), København: Danmarks Lærerhøjskole.
  24. Sørensen, B.H., Olesen, B.R. And Audon, L. (2001) Det hele kører parallelt. De nye medie i børns hverdagsliv (Everything runs parallel. New media and children‟s everyday lives), København: Gads Forlag.
  25. Turkle, S. & Papert, S. (1990) “Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete”, SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Autumn 1990, Vol. 16 (1). Tyner, K. 1998, Literacy in a Digital World, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  26. UVM (2009) Fællesmål 2 (Ministry of Education, New Shared Goals) [online] H http://www.faellesmaalHuvm.dk/fag/Natur_teknik/trinmaal.html.
  27. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2). 225-246 www.ejel.org

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links