![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/irrodl.jpg)
Emergent learning and interactive media artworks: Parameters of interaction for novice groups
ARTICLE
Marta Kawka, School of Education and Professional Studies, Griffith University, Australia ; Kevin Larkin, Faculty of Education, University of Southern Queensland, Australia ; Patrick Danaher
IRRODL Volume 12, Number 7, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Abstract
Emergent learning describes learning that occurs when participants interact and distribute knowledge, where learning is self-directed, and where the learning destination of the participants is largely unpredictable (Williams, Karousou, & Mackness, 2011). These notions of learning arise from the topologies of social networks and can be applied to the learning that occurs in educational institutions. However, the question remains whether institutional frameworks can accommodate the opposing notion of “cooperative systems” (Shirky, 2005), systems that facilitate the creation of user-generated content, particularly as first-year education cohorts are novice groups in the sense of not yet having developed university-level knowledge.This paper theorizes an emergent learning assessment item (Flickr photo-narratives) within a first-year media arts undergraduate education course. It challenges the conventional models of student–lecturer interaction by outlining a methodology of teaching for emergence that will facilitate student-directed and open-ended learning. The paper applies a matrix with four parameters (teacher-directed content/student-directed content; non-interactive learning task/interactive learning framework). This matrix is used as a conceptual space within which to investigate how a learning task might be constructed to afford the best opportunities for emergent learning. It explores the strategies that interactive artists utilize for participant engagement (particularly the relationship between the artist and the audience in the creation of interactive artworks) and suggests how these strategies might be applied to emergent generative outcomes with first-year education students.We build upon Williams et al.’s framework of emergent learning, where “content will not be delivered to learners but co-constructed with them” (De Freitas & Conole, as cited in Williams et al., 2011, p. 40), and the notion that in constructing emergent learning environments “considerable effort is required to ensure an effective balance between openness and constraint” (Williams et al., 2011, p. 39). We assert that for a learning event within a Web 2.0 environment to be considered emergent, not only does there need to be an effective balance between teacher-directed content and student-directed content for knowledge to be open, creative, and distributed by learners (Williams et al., 2011), but there also need to be multiple opportunities for interaction and communication between students within the system and that these “drive the emergence of structures that are more complex than the mere parts of that system” (Sommerer & Mignonneau, 2002, p. 161).
Citation
Kawka, M., Larkin, K. & Danaher, P. (2011). Emergent learning and interactive media artworks: Parameters of interaction for novice groups. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7), 40-55. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 15, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/49394/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Cameron, A. (2005). Dinner with Myron Or: Rereading artificial reality 2: Reflections on interface and art. In J. Brouwer, S. Fauconnier, A. Mulder& A. Nigten (Eds.), aRt& D: Research and development in art (pp. 10–27). Rotterdam, The Netherlands:
- Feingold, K. (2002). The interactive art gambit. In M. Reiser& A. Zapp (Eds.), New screen media: Cinema/art/narrative (pp. 120–134). London: British Film Institute.
- Hansen, M.B.N. (2005). Embodiment: The machine and the human. In J. Brouwer, S. Fauconnier, A. Mulder, & A. Nigten (Eds.), aRt& D: Research and development in art (pp. 150–165). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: V2_Publishing/NAI Publishers.
- Irlbeck, S., Kays, E., Jones, D., & Sims, R. (2006). The Phoenix rising: Emergent models of instructional design. Distance Education, 27(2), 171–185.
- Kawka, M. (2009). Play, the university, and everything.... (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
- Kawka, M. (2011, April 14). Dudu in the city [Flickr Photostream set]. Retrieved May 6, 2011, from http://www.flickr.com/photos/sfod/sets/72157626541890168/
- Lieberman, Z. (2000). Gesture machines. Retrieved from http://www.theremediproject.com/projects/issue12/systemisgesture/index.html
- Queensland Studies Authority. (2008). The arts knowledge and understanding– Years 3–9. Brisbane, Qld, Australia: The State of Queensland, Queensland Studies Authority. Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/early_middle/Qcar_el_arts_kau.pdf
- Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83–94.
- Shaw, J. (2008, January 10). Mornings with Margaret Throsby [Radio Broadcast]. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Classic FM.
- Shirky, C. (2005). Clay Shirky on institutions versus collaboration. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/clay_shirky_on_institutions_versus_collaboration.html
- Sims, R. (2008). Rethinking (e)learning: A manifesto for connected generations. Distance Education, 29(2), 153–164.
- Sommerer, C., & Mignonneau, L. (2002). Modeling the emergence of complexity: Complex systems, the origin of life and interactive on-line art. Leonardo, 35(2), 161–169.
- Stallabrass, J. (2003). Internet art: The online clash of culture and commerce. London: Tate Publishing.
- Weibel, P. (2008). User art _ Nutzerkunst: YOU_ser: The century of the consumer exhibition. Karlsruhe, Germany: ZKM, Centre for Art and Media. Retrieved from http://www02.zkm.de/youser/ Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 39–59. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/883/1686
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References