You are here:

Improving the Workspace Awareness of Authors in Asynchronous Collaborative Authoring of Learning Designs
PROCEEDINGS

, , The University of Southampton, United Kingdom

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Denver, Colorado, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-95-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Creating adaptive learning resources is a complex, time-consuming process. Problems emerged regarding interoperability, reusability, and collaboration. This paper discusses a collaborative authoring approach to develop adaptive learning resources. The contribution of this paper is twofold. The first contribution is the analysis of the most suitable learning standard for representing adaptive learning resources and to be used for collaborative authoring. It is gained from an analysis and experiments through designing some small cases in various learning standards. The second contribution is the analysis of the implication of two collaborative features: Notes in which authors can leave comments and History which records provenance information. It is gained from a Between-group experiment. One finding shows that IMS Learning Design (IMS LD) has more advantages than other learning standards. Another finding shows that Note and History have positive implications for collaborative authoring of adaptive learning resources represented in IMS LD.

Citation

Nurjanah, D. & Davis, H.C. (2012). Improving the Workspace Awareness of Authors in Asynchronous Collaborative Authoring of Learning Designs. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2012--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1366-1376). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 10, 2024 from .

© 2012 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Altman, H.B. (1992). Writing a Syllabus. In. Http://www.bergen.edu/gened/AltmanSyllabus.pdf. Accessed on
  2. Christensen, T.K. & Osguthorpe, R.T. (2004). How do instructional-design practitioners make instructionalstrategy decisions? In Performance Improvement Quarterly (vol. 17, pp. 45-65).
  3. Consortium, I.G.L. (2012). Learning Design Specification. In. Http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/. Accessed on March 1, 2012.
  4. Cristea, A., Smits, D. & Bra, P.D. (2005). Writing MOT, reading AHA!-converting between an authoring and a delivery system for adaptive educational hypermedia-. Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology.
  5. Dourish, P. & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. The Proceedings of The 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  6. Dourish, P. (1997). Extending Awareness Beyond Synchronous Collaboration. The Computer and Human-1374-Interaction (CHI) conference. Los Angeles.
  7. Ghali, F., Cristea, A., Stewart, C. & Hendrix, M. (2008). Collaborative adaptation authoring and social annotation in MOT. Warwick Postgraduate Colloquium in Computer Science.
  8. Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (1996). Workspace Awareness for Groupware. The Computer and Human Interaction (CHI) conference. Vancouver, Canada.
  9. Hendrix, M., Bra, P.D., Pechenizkiy, M., Smits, D. & Cristea, A. (2008). Defining adaptation in a generic multilayer model. CAM: the GRAPPLE conceptual adaptation model. In The Proceeding of EC-TEL 2008. Vol 5192/2008, pp 132-143. Springer.
  10. Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: learning and teaching in cyberspace. 1 1, pages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
  11. Kenny, R.F., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R.A. & Campbell, K. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: questions answered and questions not asked. In Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology (vol. 31(1), pp. 9-26).
  12. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A. & Chi, E.H. (2007). He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. The SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. San Jose, California, USA.
  13. Kittur, A., Lee, B. & Kraut, R.E. (2009). Coordination in collective intelligence: the role of team structure and
  14. Papadopoulou, S. (2009). Multi-Level Change Awareness for Collaborative Authoring Applications. PhD thesis, 233 pages. Zurich: ETH Zurich.
  15. Stewart, C., Cristea, A., Celik, I., and Ashman, H. (2006). Interoperability between AEH user models. In the
  16. Tudorache, T., Noy, N.F., Tu, S. & Musen, M.A. (2008). Supporting collaborative ontology development in Protégé. The 7th International Conference on the Semantic Web. Karlsruhe, Germany.
  17. Van Es, R. & Koper, R. (2006). Testing the pedagogical expressiveness of IMS LD. In Journal of Educational Technology& Society (vol. 9, pp. 229-249).
  18. Weng, C. & Gennari, J.H. (2004). Asynchronous collaborative writing through annotations. The 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Chicago, Illinois, USA.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections