You are here:

Academic achievement across the day: Evidence from randomized class schedules
ARTICLE

, Department of Economics, United States ; , Slack Research & Analytics, United States

Economics of Education Review Volume 67, Number 1, ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

This study expands our understanding of how school day schedules affect achievement. We focus on three aspects related to scheduling: student fatigue, time of instruction, and instructor schedules. Data cover five academic years at the United States Air Force Academy, where schedules are randomized, grading is standardized, and there is substantial variance in schedule structure. Analyzing over 180,000 student-course outcomes, we find causal evidence of cognitive fatigue brought on by scheduling multiple courses in a row. The expected performance of two students in the same class may differ by as much as 0.15 standard deviations simply owing to their prior schedules. All else equal, students perform better in the afternoon than in the early morning. We also note that instruction improves with repetition. Heterogeneous effects by ability suggest that overall gains are possible. Prioritizing certain schedules would be equivalent to improving teacher quality by one-third of a standard deviation. A reorganization of students’ daily school schedules is a promising and potentially low-cost educational intervention.

Citation

Williams, K.M. & Shapiro, T.M. (2018). Academic achievement across the day: Evidence from randomized class schedules. Economics of Education Review, 67(1), 158-170. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved August 5, 2024 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on March 1, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.10.007

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ackerman, P.L., & Kanfer, R. (2009). Test length and cognitive fatigue: An empirical examination of effects on performance and test-taker reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 15(2), pp. 163-181.
  2. Blake, M. (1967). Time of day effects on performance in a range of tasks. Psychonomic Science, 9(6), pp. 349-350.
  3. Booij, A.S., Leuven, E., & Oosterbeek, H. (2017). Ability peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(2), pp. 547-578.
  4. Cardinali, D. (2008). Chronoeducation: How the biological clock influences the learning process. The educated brain, pp. 110-126.
  5. Carrell, S.E., Fullerton, R.L., & West, J.E. (2009). Does your cohort matter? measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), pp. 439-464.
  6. Carrell, S.E., Maghakian, T., & West, J.E. (2011). A’S from zzzz’s? the causal effect of school start time on the academic achievement of adolescents. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(3), pp. 62-81.
  7. Carrell, S.E., Sacerdote, B.I., & West, J.E. (2013). From natural variation to optimal policy? the importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica, 81(3), pp. 855-882.
  8. Carrell, S.E., & West, J.E. (2010). Does professor quality matter? evidence from random assignment of students to professors. Journal of Political Economy, 118(1).
  9. Carskadon, M., Vieira, C., & Acebo, C. (1993). Association between puberty and delayed phase preference. Sleep, 16(3).
  10. Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N., & Rockoff, J.E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers i: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), pp. 2593-2632.
  11. Cortes, K., Bricker, J., & Rohlfs, C. (2012). The role of specific subjects in education production functions: Evidence from morning classes in chicago public high schools. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12.
  12. Cotti, C., Gordanier, J., & Ozturk, O. (2018). Class meeting frequency, start times, and academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 62, pp. 12-15.
  13. Crowley, S., Acebo, C., & Carskadon, M. (2007). Sleep, circadian rhythms, and delayed phase in adolescents. Sleep Medicine, 8, pp. 602-612.
  14. Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., & Gennaro, L.D. (2006). Sleep loss, learning capacity, and academic performance. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 10, pp. 323-337.
  15. Diette, T.M., & Raghav, M. (2015). Class size matters: Heterogeneous effects of larger classes on college student learning. Eastern Economic Journal, 41(2), pp. 273-283.
  16. Diette, T.M., & Raghav, M. (2017). Does early bird catch the worm or a lower GPA? Evidence from a liberal arts college. Applied Economics, 49(33), pp. 3341-3350.
  17. Dills, A., & Hernandez-Julian, R. (2008). Course scheduling and academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 27, pp. 646-654.
  18. Edwards, F. (2012). Early to rise? The effect of daily start times on academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 31(6), pp. 970-983.
  19. Goldstein, D., Hahn, C., Hasher, L., Wiprzycka, U., & Zelazo, P.D. (2007). Time of day, intellectual performance, and behavioral problems in morning versus evening type adolescents: Is there a synchrony effect?. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3).
  20. Groen, J., & Pabilonia, S. W. (2017). Snooze or lose: High school start times and academic achievement. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11166, IZA.
  21. Heissel, J., & Norris, S. (2018). Rise and shine: The effect of school start times on academic performance from childhood through puberty. Journal of Human Resources, 53(4), pp. 957-992.
  22. Hinrichs, P. (2011). When the bell tolls: The effects of school starting times on academic achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 6(4), pp. 486-507.
  23. Jackson, S.A., Sabina, K., & Eugene, A. (2014). Low cognitive load and reduced arousal impede practice effects on executive functioning, metacognitive confidence and decision making. PLoS One, 9(12), p. e115689.
  24. Jacob, B.A., & Rockoff, J.E. (2011). Organizing schools to improve student achievement: start times, grade configurations, and teacher assignments.
  25. Kane, T.J., & Staiger, D.O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation.
  26. Lusher, L., & Yasenov, V. (2018). Gender performance gaps: Quasi-experimental evidence on the role of gender differences in sleep cycles. Economic Inquiry, 56(1), pp. 252-262.
  27. Monks, J., & Schmidt, R.M. (2011). The impact of class size on outcomes in higher education. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1), pp. 1-19.
  28. Persson, J., Welsh, K.M., Jonides, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P.A. (2007). Cognitive fatigue of executive processes: Interaction between interference resolution tasks. Neuropsychologia, 45(7), pp. 1571-1579.
  29. Pope, N. (2015). How time of day affects productivity: Evidence from school schedules. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1).
  30. Schmidt, C., Collette, F., Cajochen, C., & Peigneux, P. (2007). A time to think: Circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(7), pp. 755-789.
  31. Trocket, M., Barnes, M., & Egget, D. (2000). Health-related varibales and academic performance among first-year college students: Implications for sleep and other behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 49.
  32. Vogel-Walcutt, J., Fiorella, L., & Carper Teresa and Schatz Sae (2012). The definition, assessment, and mitigation of state boredom within educational settings: A comprehensive review. Educational Psychology Review, 24, pp. 89-111.
  33. Wahlstrom, K. (2002). Changing times: Findings from the first longitudinal study of later high school start times. NASSP Bulletin, 86(633).
  34. Wahlstrom, K., Dretzke, B., Gordon, M., Peterson, K., Edwards, K., & Gdula, J. (2014). Examining the impact of later high school start times on the health and academic performance of high school students: A multi-site study. Available online: https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/162769.
  35. Wolfson, A., & Carskadon, M. (1998). Sleep schedules and daily functioning in adolescents. Child Development, 69(4), pp. 875-887.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References