You are here:

Using the Five Whys Methods in the Classroom: How to Turn Students into Problem Solvers
ARTICLE

,

Journal of STEM Education Volume 17, Number 4, ISSN 1557-5284 Publisher: Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Full Text

Abstract

During the past few decades, a great deal of attention have been devoted to root cause analysis and structured problem solving techniques. One such technique is called the "Five Whys" which is used by many corporations to solve problems. The "Five" is an arbitrary number that is intended to promote deeper probing into the root cause of a problem by asking many "Whys". In this paper, we discuss how we used this technique in civil engineering classes to get the students to work out, on their own, what they did wrong in class assignments and fix them. The approach presented in this paper also better prepare students for practice of engineering. When a product malfunctions, the engineer(s) who designed the product need to go back and figure out what went wrong and fix it. The benefits and challenges of using the "Five Whys" Technique to turn students into problem solvers on their own are also presented in this paper.

Citation

Moaveni, S. & Chou, K. (2017). Using the Five Whys Methods in the Classroom: How to Turn Students into Problem Solvers. Journal of STEM Education, 17(4),. Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE). Retrieved August 11, 2024 from .

© 2017 Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. [4] Kelly Walsh (2012), “Can Social Media Play a Role in Improving Retention in Higher Education? Research Says it Can,” Emerging EdTech, October 28, 2012 Issue.
  2. [5] Avi Wolfman-Arent (2014), “Why This Professor is Encouraging Facebook Use in His Classroom”, the Chronicle of Higher Education, August 5, 2014 Issue.
  3. [6] Bransford, J.D. (1979) Human Cognition: Learning, Understanding, and Remembering, Wadsworth, CA.
  4. [8] Broudy, H.S. (1977), “Types of Knowledge and Purposes in Education,” Schooling and the
  5. [9] Byrnes, J.P. (1996) Cognitive Development and Learning in Instructional Contexts, and Bacon, Boston.
  6. [10] Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, N.W., Reimann, P., and Glaser, R. (1989) “Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems,” Cognitive Science, Vol. 13, pp. 145-182.
  7. [11] Chi, M.T.H., deLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., and LaVancher, C. (1994) “Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding,” Cognitive Science, Vol. 18, pp. 439477.
  8. [12] Luchins, A.S. And Luchins, E.H. (1970) Werbeimer’s Seminar Revisited: Problem Solving and Thinking, Vol. 1, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
  9. [13] Singley, K. And Anderson, J.R. (1989) The Transfer of Cognitive Skill, Harvard University Press, MA.
  10. [15] Klausmeier, H.J. (1985) Education Psychology, 5th ed., Harper and Row, New York.
  11. [16] Gick, M.L. And Holyoak, K.J. (1983) “Sch. Induction and Analogical Transfer,” Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 1-38.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links

Also Read

Related Collections