You are here:

Developing an Opinion: How to get students thinking in a Large Lab Computer Science Ethics Course
PROCEEDING

, The University of Alabama, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This round table discussion proposal focuses on critical reflective thinking exercises in a low stakes format for a large computer science ethics course using the LMS system. The instructor is looking at methods of assessment, impact, and effectiveness. Currently the method of discussion is restricted to the use of low stakes reflective activities placed throughout the lecture day.

Citation

Odom-Bartel, R. (2016). Developing an Opinion: How to get students thinking in a Large Lab Computer Science Ethics Course. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2237-2241). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 11, 2024 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Colaizzi, P.F. (1973). Reflection and research in psychology: a phenomenological study of learning. New York: Hunt Publications.
  2. Dewey, J. (1933). Howe we think: A restatement of relation of reactive thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.
  3. Dymant, J.E., & O’Connell, T.S. (2010). The quality of reflection in student journals: A review of limiting and enabling factors. Innovative Higher Education, 35, 233-244.
  4. Elbow, P. (1997). High Stakes and Low Stakes in Assigning and Responding to Writing. New Directions For Teaching And Learning, (69), 5-13.
  5. Eyler,J., Giles,D., & Schmiede,A.(1996).A practitioner’s guide to reflection inservice-learning: Student voices and reflections. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  6. Graham, A., & Phelps, R. (2003). Being a teacher: Developing teacher identity and enhancing practice through metacognitive and reflective learning processes. Australian Journal of Techer Education, 27 (2), 11-24.
  7. Jones, I., & Alinier, G. (2009). Introduction of a new reflective framework to enhance students’ simulation learning: a preliminary evaluation. Blended Learning in Practice, 1-19.
  8. Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., & Wong, F.Y. (2008). A Four-Category Scheme for Coding and Assessing the Level of Reflection in Written Work. Assessment& Evaluation In Higher Education, 33(4), 369-379
  9. Lam Tsang, A.K. (2011). In-class Reflective Group Discussion as a Strategy for the Development of Students as Evolving Professionals. International Journal For The Scholarship Of Teaching& Learning, 5(1), 1.
  10. Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Science Education, 14, 595-621.
  11. McAninch, A.C. (2006). Dewey's Theory of Reflective Thinking: A Needed Reality Check for Teacher Education. Teacher Education And Practice, (1),
  12. McDonald, J., & Dominguez, L. (2009). Developing Patterns for Learning in Science Through Reflection. Journal Of College Science Teaching, 39(1), 38-42.
  13. Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32 (2), 3-24.
  14. Neff, J., McAuliffe, G.J., Whithaus, C., & Quinlan, N.P. (2012). Low-Stakes, Reflective Writing: Moving Students into Their Professional Fields. Currents In Teaching& Learning, 4(2), 18.
  15. Peters, E. (2008). Assessing scientific inquiry. Science Scope, 31 (5), 27-32.
  16. Rama, D.V. (2001). Using structured reaction to enhance learning from service. Campus Compact.
  17. Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104, 842-866
  18. Sparks-Langer, G.M., Simmons, J.M., & Pasch, M. (1990). Reflective pedagogical thinking: how can we promote it and measure it? Journal of Teacher Education 41 (4), 23-32

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References