Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust
ARTICLE
Michelene T. H. Chi
Journal of the Learning Sciences Volume 14, Number 2, ISSN 1050-8406
Abstract
This article offers a plausible domain-general explanation for why some concepts of processes are resistant to instructional remediation although other, apparently similar concepts are more easily understood. The explanation assumes that processes may differ in ontological ways: that some processes (such as the apparent flow in diffusion of dye in water) are emergent and other processes (such as the flow of blood in human circulation) are direct. Although precise definition of the two kinds of processes are probably impossible, attributes of direct and emergent processes are described that distinguish them in a domain-general way. Circulation and diffusion, which are used as examples of direct and emergent processes, are associated with different kinds of misconceptions. The claim is that students' misconceptions for direct kinds of processes, such as blood circulation, are of the same ontological kind as the correct conception, suggesting that misconceptions of direct processes may be nonrobust. However, students' misconceptions of emergent processes are robust because they misinterpret emergent processes as a kind of commonsense direct processes. To correct such a misconception requires a re-representation or a conceptual shift across ontological kinds. Therefore, misconceptions of emergent processes are robust because such a shift requires that students know about the emergent kind and can overcome their (perhaps even innate) predisposition to conceive of all processes as a direct kind. Such a domain-general explanation suggests that teaching students the causal structure underlying emergent processes may enable them to recognize and understand a variety of emergent processes for which they have robust misconceptions, such as concepts of electricity, heat and temperature, and evolution.
Citation
Chi, M.T.H. (2005). Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199. Retrieved August 11, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/165930/.
ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
Keywords
Cited By
View References & Citations Map-
Using Hands-on Learning Modules to Address Challenging Concepts in Electricity and Magnetism
James Rutter, Nigel Standish & Glen Bull, University of Virginia, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 1510–1515
-
Science Instruction at a Distance: What can we see?
Cynthia Clark, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 1092–1101
-
Convergent Adaptation in Small Groups: Understanding Professional Development Activities Through a Complex Systems Lens
Susan Yoon, Lei Liu & Sao-Ee Goh, University of Pennsylvania, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 18, No. 2 (April 2010) pp. 319–344
-
Comprehending Emergent Phenomena: Through Direct-Manipulation Animation
Priscilla Aguirre & John Black, Teachers College - Columbia University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2009 (Jun 22, 2009) pp. 3486–3490
-
Inventing the Digital Dashboard for Learning
Diana Bajzek, William Brown, Marsha Lovett & Gordon Rule, Carnegie Mellon University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2007 (Jun 25, 2007) pp. 1084–1092
-
Changing Conceptions in E-Learning: Debates and Dialogues
Derek A. Muller, University of Sydney, Australia; John Eklund, Access Testing, Australia
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 1360–1367
-
Improving the Feedback Cycle to Improve Learning in Introductory Biology Using the Digital Dashboard
William E. Brown, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Marsha Lovett, Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence, Carnegie Mellon University, United States; Diana Bajzek, Carnegie Mellon Univ., United States; James M. Burnette, Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 1030–1035
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.