Blended synchronous learning: Patterns and principles for simultaneously engaging co-located and distributed learners
PROCEEDINGS
Matt Bower, Jacqueline Kenney, Macquarie University ; Barney Dalgarno, Charles Sturt University ; Gregor E. Kennedy, The University of Melbourne
ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, ISBN 978-1-74138-403-1 Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Abstract
This paper presents seven blended synchronous learning designs and articulates principles for implementation as espoused by the teachers who enacted them. Blended synchronous learning approaches use media-rich synchronous technologies to enable remote and face -to-face students to co-participate in the same live classes. A wide range of technologies (video conferencing, web conferencing, virtual worlds), tasks (collaborative evaluation, group questioning, class discussion, problem solving, collaborative design) and levels of student interaction (from lightweight to tightly coupled) were present within the blended synchronous learning designs. The main issues that teachers confronted when teaching blended synchronous lessons were communication issues and issues related to cognitive overload caused by split attention. Key pedagogical principles for enactment as identified by the lead teachers included the need for extensive preparation, clear instructions, composure, flexibility, advance preparation of students and savvy utilisation of support staff. These findings represent initial results from an Office of Learning and Teaching project entitled ‘Blended synchronicity: Uniting on-campus and distributed learners using media- rich real-time collaboration tools’ (further details available at http://www.blendsync.org/).
Citation
Bower, M., Kenney, J., Dalgarno, B. & Kennedy, G.E. (2013). Blended synchronous learning: Patterns and principles for simultaneously engaging co-located and distributed learners. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney (pp. 92-102). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved August 8, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/162013/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Bower, M., Cram, A. & Groom, D. (2010). Blended reality: Issues and potentials in combining virtual worlds and face-to-face classes. In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds), Curriculum, technology& Transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 129-140). Brisbane,
- Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. New York, NY: Elsevier.
- Goodsell, A.S., Maher, M.R., Tinto, V., Smith, B.L. & MacGregor, J.T. (Eds) (1992). Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
- Gosper, M., Green, D., McNeill, M., Phillips, R., Preston, G. & Woo, K. (2008). The impact of web-based lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching [Final project report]. Sydney, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
- Irvine, V. (2009). The emergence of choice in ‘multi-access’ learning environments: Transferring locus of control of course access to the learner. In G. Siemens& C. Fulford (Eds), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 746-752). Chesapeake, VA:
- James, R., Krause, K. & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education. 30th ascilite Conference 2013 Proceedings Page 101
- Lidstone, J. & Shield, P. (2010). Virtual reality or virtually real: Blended teaching and learning in a Master’s level research methods class. In Y. Inoue (Ed.), Cases on online and blended learning technologies in higher education: Concepts and practices (pp. 91-111). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
- Neuman, W.L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Norberg, A. (2012). Blended learning and new education logistics in Northern Sweden. In D.G. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers: Education and information technologies (pp. 327-330). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
- Pope, C. (2010, September). Breaking down barriers: Providing flexible participation options for on-campus courses. Paper presented at the Fifth Education Research Group of Adelaide (ERGA) Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
- Power, T.M. (2008). The emergence of a blended online learning environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 513-514.
- Power, T.M. & Vaughan, N. (2010). Redesigning online learning for international graduate seminar delivery. The Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 19-38.
- Roseth, C., Akcaoglu, M. & Zellner, A. (2013). Blending synchronous face-to-face and computer-supported cooperative learning in a hybrid doctoral seminar. TechTrends, 57(3), 54-59.
- Spann, D. (2012). Five innovative ways to use virtual classrooms in higher education. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett& T. Stewart (Eds), Future challenges, sustainable futures. Proceedings ascilite Wellington 2012. Wellington, New Zealand: Massey University.
- Stewart, A.R., Harlow, D.B. & DeBacco, K. (2011). Students’ experience of synchronous learning in distributed environments. Distance Education, 32(3), 357-381.
- Tertiary Education Qualification Standards Agency (2013). TEQSA and the Australian qualifications framework– questions and answers. Retrieved from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/for-providers/frequently-asked-questionsproviders
- White, C.P., Ramirez, R., Smith, J.G. & Plonowski, L. (2010). Simultaneous delivery of a face-to-face course to on-campus and remote off-campus students. TechTrends, 54(4), 34-40.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References