Abstract

The thesis of this paper is that the open and distance education sector is based on a framework of terminology that is typologically inconsistent and which lacks clarity, and open and distance education teaching and learning models are examined to explore these concerns. The findings of this analysis are then used to assist in the articulation of a strategic direction for a regional dual-mode Australian university and to identify appropriate branding for its off-campus model of education. Concerns are raised as to the appropriateness of an "online" message to prospective students given possible adverse perceptions of a learning environment that may not align with the needs and expectations of distance learners.

Citation

Todhunter, B. (2013). LOL--Limitations of Online Learning--Are We Selling the Open and Distance Education Message Short?. Distance Education, 34(2), 232-252. Retrieved August 15, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/157390/.

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

• blended learning
• Computer Networks
• Cooperative learning
• EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
• Educational Research
• electronic learning
• Enrollment
• Flexible Progression
• Foreign Countries
• Interpersonal Relationship
• Large Group Instruction
• online courses
• Open Education
• student attitudes
• student evaluation
• STUDENT SCHOOL RELATIONSHIP
• Student Surveys
• Teacher Student Relationship