You are here:

Can the Same Results be Obtained Using Computer-mediated Tests as for Paper-based Tests for National Curriculum Assessment?
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , The Queen's University of Belfast

International Conference on Mathematics / Science Education and Technology, Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Full Text

Abstract

This paper describes part of a research programme designed to explore the validity of using computer mediated tests as opposed to paper-based ones for National Curriculum testing in mathematics at Key stage 3. Previous research in this area has focused primarily on the comparison between computer-based and paper-based multiple choice questions while this research uses constructed response questions similar to those used at present in National Curriculum testing. A total of 127 pupils was tested using questions based on items selected from National tests in mathematics at Key stage 3. The study showed that where questions tested similar cognitive tasks there were no significant differences in outcomes. Questions requiring spatial awareness were more difficult when presented in a computer environment. Also the study illustrated that constant care is required to ensure that computer-based questions do not change the level of cognitive tasks of paper-based examples. The paper demonstrates the potential and limitations of a shift to computer based assessment.

Citation

Greenwood, L., McBride, F., Morrison, H., Cowan, P. & Lee, M. (2000). Can the Same Results be Obtained Using Computer-mediated Tests as for Paper-based Tests for National Curriculum Assessment?. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics / Science Education and Technology 2000 (pp. 179-184). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 7, 2024 from .

© 2000 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Angoff, W.H. (1971). Scales, norms and equivalent scores, in R.L. Thorndike (Ed.) Educational Measurement, 2nd edn., pp 508-600. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  2. Healy, J., Morrison, H.G., & Wylie, C. (1995). National Curriculum attainment target tests in mathematics (File I: Levels 2-5 & File II: Levels 6-8). Pp. 139-141. London: John Murray.
  3. Lunz, M.E. & Bergstrom, BA (1995). Equating computerised adaptive certification examinations: the Board of Registry series of studies. National Council of Measurement in Education. San Francisco, C.A: AREA.
  4. Cowan, P (1997). Using information technology to assess and report mathematical attainment as a multidimensional construct against a scale of standards. Unpublished doctoral thesis. The Queens University Belfast.
  5. Green, B.F. (1983). Adaptive testing by computer. In R.B. Ekstrom (Ed.) Measurement, technology and individual education: new directions for testing and measurement, 17, 5-12. San Francisco, CA: jossey-Bass.
  6. Green, B.F., Bock, R.D., Humphreys, L.G., Linn, R.L. & Reckase, M.D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerised adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 4, 347-360.
  7. Murphy, R.J. (1982). Sex Differences in Objective Test Performance, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 213-19.
  8. Nuttall, D.L. (1987). Moderating Instrument Research Project, A Summary Report. London: BTEC.
  9. Traub, R.E. (1993). On the equivalence of the Traits Assessed by Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Tests in Bennett, R.E. & Ward, W.C. (Eds.). Construction versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement: Issues in Constructed Response, Performance Testing, and Portfolio Assessment. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Wood, R. (1987). Assessment and Equal Opportunities, Text of Public Lecture at ULIE (11 November 1987).
  11. Wood, R. (1991). Assessment and Testing: A survey of research commissioned by the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.