From OER to PLAR: Credentialing for Open Education
ARTICLE
Norm Friesen, Thompson Rivers University ; Christine Wihak
Open Praxis Volume 5, Number 1, ISSN 1369-9997 e-ISSN 1369-9997 Publisher: International Council for Open and Distance Education
Abstract
Recent developments in OER and MOOCs (Open Educational Resources and Massive Open Online Courses) have raised questions as to how learners engaging with these courses and components might be assessed or credentialed. This descriptive and exploratory paper examines PLAR (Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition) as a possible answer to these questions. It highlights three possible connections between PLAR and open education which hold the greatest promise for credentialing open learning experiences: 1) PLAR may be used to assess and credential open educational activities through the use of exam banks such as CLEP (College Level Examination Program); 2) Learning occurring in xMOOCs (MOOCs based on already credentialed courses) and in other open contexts resembling “courses” may be assessed in PLAR through course-based portfolios; and 3) PLAR may also be enabled through the specification of “gap learning” facilitated through OER of many different kinds. After describing these options, the paper concludes that although the connections leading from open educational contexts to PLAR credentialing are currently disparate and ad hoc, they may become more widespread and also more readily recognized in the PLAR and OER communities.
Citation
Friesen, N. & Wihak, C. (2013). From OER to PLAR: Credentialing for Open Education. Open Praxis, 5(1), 49-58. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved August 7, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130654/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Carliner, S. (2012). Informal Learning Basics. Alexandria VA: ASTD Press. College Level Examination Program (CLEP). (2012). College Level Examination Program. Retrieved from http://clep.collegeboard.org/ Coursera. (2012a, November 13). American Council on Education to Evaluate Credit Equivalency for Coursera’s Online Courses. Retrieved Dec. 10, 2012 from http://blog.coursera.org/
- Masterman, L. & Wild, J. (2011). OER Impact Study: Research Report. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/oer/JISCOERImpactStudyResearchReportv1-0.pdf MIT OCW. (2011). MIT Opencourseware 2011 Program Evaluation Findings Summary. Retrieved July 13, 2012 from: http://ocw.mit.edu/about/site-statistics/11_Eval_Summary_112311_MITOCW.pdf
- MITx. (2012). MITx: MIT’s new online learning initiative. Retrieved from http://mitx.mit.edu/ Peck, K. (2012). Five MORE Reasons to Like Badges. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.
- UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of OpenCourseware for higher education in developing countries final report. Retrieved July 13, 2012 from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/ 001285/128515e.pdf.
- Wihak, C. & Hall, G. (2011). Work-related Informal Learning—National Adult Literacy Database. Ottawa: Centre for Workplace Skills. Wiley, D. (March 19, 2012). Why Universities will be the Biggest Awarder of Badges (and When). Iterating towards Openness. Retrieved July 13, 2012 from: http://opencontent.org/blog/ Archives/2208
- Wong, A.T. (1996). Prior Learning Assessment: A Guide for University Faculty and Administrators. Saskatoon, SK: University Extension Press. Young, J.R. (January 8, 2012). “Badges” Earned Online Pose Challenge to Traditional College Diplomas. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved July 13, 2012 from: http://chronicle.com/article/Badges-Earned-Online-Pose/130241/
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References