References

1. Andriole, S. (2006). Business technology education in the 21st century: The ongoing quest for relevance. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 1-12. Retrieved from http://jite.org/documents/Vol5/v5p001-012Andriole36.pdf Bartholomew, K. (2003). Computer literacy: Is the emperor still exposed after all these years? Journal of Computing Science in Colleges, 20(1), 323-331.
2. Berg, J. (1998). Applied logic. Rehovot, Israel: Branco Weiss Institute. (In Hebrew).
3. Boolos, G.S., & Jeffrey, R.C. (1974). Computability and logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brookfield, S.D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
5. Browne, M.N. (2001). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Browne, M.N., & Keeley, S. (2006). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Bouhnik & Giat
7. Copi, I.M. (1979). Symbolic logic (5th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
8. Copi, I.M., & Cohen C. (2004). Introduction to logic (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Epstein, R.L. (2001a). The semantic foundation of logic: Predicate logic. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Epstein, R.L. (2001b). The semantic foundation of logic: Propositional logic (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
9. Epstein, R.L. (2002). 5 ways of saying therefore. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10. Eshet, Y. (2002). Digital literacy: A new terminology framework and its application to the design of meaningful technology-based environments. In P. Barker& S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of EDMEDIA,
11. Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Geri, N. (2007). Does the medium affect the message? The influence of text representation format on critical thinking. Human Systems Management, 26(4), 269-279.
12. Fitzgerald, M.A. (2005). Skills for evaluating web-based information. Internet Credibility Symposium, University of Washington, Seattle, April. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/515336/Fitzgerald-Skills Gabbay, D., & Woods, J. (2004). Handbook of the history of logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Godel, K. (1962). On formally undecidable propositions of principia mathematica and related systems. Mineola, NY: Dover.
14. Hacking, I. (2001). An introduction to probability and inductive logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Johnson, D., Bartholomew, K., & Miller, D. (2006). Improving computer literacy of business management majors: A case study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 77-94. Retrieved from http://jite.org/documents/Vol5/v5p077-094Johnson100.pdf Kahane, H. (1980). The nature and classification of fallacies. In J.A. Blair& R.H. Johnson (Eds.), Informal logic: The first international symposium (pp. 31-39). Inverness, CA: Edgepress.
16. Kahane, H. (1989). The proper subject matter for critical thinking courses. Argumentation, 3(2), 141-147.
17. Kahane, H., & Cavender, N.M. (2006). Logic and contemporary rhetoric: The use of reason in everyday life (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
18. Katz, R.H., & Borriello G. (2004). Contemporary logic design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Kerka, S. (1999). Consumer education for the information age. Practice Application Brief, 4, 12-15.
20. Lewis, H.R., & Papadimitriou, C.H. (1981). Elements of the theory of computation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Lighthall, L., & Haycock, K. (1997). Information rich but knowledge poor? Emerging issues for schools and libraries worldwide. Seattle, WA: International Association of School Librarianship.
22. Markovitz, A.B. (2005). Introduction to logic design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGrawHill.
23. Mano, M.M. (2001). Digital design (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Paul, R.W. (1982). Teaching critical thinking in the ‘strong’ sense: A focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Logic, 4(2), 2-7.
26. Rescher, N. (2001). Paradoxes: Their roots, range and resolution. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
27. Resnick, M. (2002). Rethinking learning in the digital age. In G. Kirkman (Ed.), The global information technology report 2001-2002: Readiness for the networked world (pp. 32-37). Oxford, UK: Oxford
28. Rothenberg, D. (1997, August 15). How the web destroys the quality of students’ research papers. Chronicle of Higher Education, P. A44.
29. Ruggiero, V.R. (1991). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
30. Sainsbury, R.M. (1995). Paradoxes (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Salomon, G. (2000). Technology and education in the information age. Tel Aviv: Haifa University/Zemora-Bitan Publishers. (In Hebrew).
32. Shapiro, J.J., & Hughes, S.K. (1996). Information literacy as a liberal art. Educom Review, 31(2), 31-35.
33. Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. (2004). Stanford Web Credibility Research: (Mostly) Evidence-based articles on web credibility. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://credibility.stanford.edu/credlit.html
34. Swartz, R.J., Fischer, S.D., & Parks, S. (1998). Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into secondary science: A lesson design handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Books and Software.
35. Thomas, T., Davis, T., & Kazlauskas, A. (2007). Embedding critical thinking in IS curricula. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 327-346. Retrieved from http://jite.org/documents/Vol6/JITEv6p327-346Thomas253.pdf Turing, A. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42, 230-265.
36. Wakerly, J.F. (2005). Digital design: Principles and practices (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Links

• Full Text (external link)