You are here:

Learning through computers: Uncovering students' thought processes while solving physics problems
ARTICLE

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 24, Number 5, ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Abstract

This paper presents a study that illustrates how the author and an in service secondary school teacher used basic synchronous computer mediated communications (CMC) technology to help them uncover students' physics preconceptions and thought processes (including their misconceptions and misunderstandings) in a real class setting. In this paper, I first provide a discussion on constructivist science learning environments, highlighting the central role students' preconceptions play in their learning in the science subject domain. Next, I argue that in light of constructivist learning principles, learning may be viewed as a conceptual change process; a process which is facilitated by active problem solving attempts. I then present a study (which was part of a larger design experiment) whereby student pairs worked collaboratively to solve physics questions via NetMeeting, a free CMC software from Microsoft. Results pertaining to how protocol data of students' problem solving attempts (as recorded by NetMeeting) provided us with rich insights into the students' thought processes that are normally not easily accessible are discussed. Finally, I consider further research work that could be done in light of the findings of this study.

Citation

Soong, B. & Soong, B. (2008). Learning through computers: Uncovering students' thought processes while solving physics problems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5),. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved September 1, 2024 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aguirre, J. (1988). Student preconceptions about vector kinematics. The Physics Teacher, 26, 212216.
  2. Arons, A. (1989). Guest comment: Proposed revisions of the introductory physics course. The American Journal of Physics, 57, 681-682.
  3. Cahyadi, V. (2007). Improving teaching and learning in introductory physics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
  4. Chen, W. & Looi, C.K. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 307326. Http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/chen.html
  5. Chong, E. (2008). Harnessing distributed musical expertise through edublogging. Australasian Journal of Education Technology, 24(2), 181-194.
  6. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. NY: Macmillan.
  7. Dewey, J. (1938) Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
  8. Duffy, T. & Cunningham, D. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Simon and Schuster, 170-198.
  9. Elgort, I., Smith, A. & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group coursework? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 195-210.
  10. Heller, P. & Heller, K. (1999). Cooperative group problem solving in physics. University of Minnesota Physics Education Research and Development. [viewed 19 Jan 2008]. Http://groups.physics.umn.edu/physed/Research/CGPS/GreenBook.html
  11. Hsi, S. (1997). Facilitating knowledge integration in science through electronic discussion: The multimedia forum kiosk. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
  12. Hung, D. (1996). The social construction of mathematical meanings through computer-mediated collaborative problem solving environments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, National University of Singapore. Soong 609
  13. Hung, D. (1998). Epistemological change through peer apprenticeship learning: From rule-based to idea-based social constructivism. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 45-80.
  14. Jamaludin, A., Ho, C., & Chee, Y. (2007). Argument-based negotiation and conflict resolution through enactive role play in Second Life. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computers in Education. Hiroshima, Amsterdam: IOS Press. 561–568.
  15. Jehng, J (1999). Exploring learning potentials in network-enhanced learning environment. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA. Charlottesville, VA: ACCE. 675-680.
  16. Kang, S., Scharmann, L., Noh, T. & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037-1058.
  17. Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-28.
  18. Lockyer L., Harper B. & Patterson J. (1999), Health education in a web-based learning environment: Learners' perceptions. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA. Charlottesville, VA: ACCE. 56-61.
  19. Lund, K. & Baker, M. (1999). Teachers' collaborative interpretations of students' computermediated collaborative problem solving interactions. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 147-152.
  20. Merzbacher, E. (1990). Guest comment: How shall we teach physics in the 21st century? The American Journal of Physics, 58, 717-718.
  21. Moll, L.C., & Diaz, S. (1987). Change as the goal of educational research. Anthropology& Education Quarterly, 18(4), 300-311.
  22. Nersessian, N. (1998). Conceptual change. In W. Bechtel, & G. Graham (Eds), A companion to cognitive science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 157-166.
  23. Ng, C.S.L. & Cheung, W.S. (2007). Comparing face to face, tutor led discussion and online discussion in the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 455-469.
  24. Olenick, R. (2005). Stop I can’t fit anything more into my head: How students learn physics. Address at NSTA (National Science Teachers Association) National Conference, Dallas: http://phys.udallas.edu/physics/rpo/NSTA%20April%201,%202005%20Talk.pdf [viewed 1
  25. Price, B. & Petre, M. (1997). Large-scale interactive teaching via the Internet: Experience with problem sessions and practical work in university courses. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA. 610 Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2008, 24(5)
  26. Pring, R. (2000). The focus of educational research– educational practice and policy. In G. Thomas& R. Pring (Eds), Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum, 8-30.
  27. Resnick, L. (1989). Introduction. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1-24.
  28. Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowledge and new experience. Http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/museumeducation/priorknowledge.html
  29. [viewed on 1 May 2008]Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Salomon, G. (1998). Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: Some issues to be concerned with. Research Dialogue, 1(1), 1-12.
  31. Salomon, G. (2000). It's not just the tool, but the educational rationale that counts, Keynote address at Ed-Media 2000, Montreal. [viewed 15 Oct 2007, verified 3 Nov 2008] http://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/00/salomonkeynote.htm
  32. Schwartz, B. (1990). Guest comment: Improving the teaching of physics. The American Journal of Physics, 58, 1031-1032.
  33. Shuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-436.
  34. Shuell, T. (1990). Teaching and learning as problem solving. Theory into Practice, 29(2), 102-108.
  35. Soong, B. & Chee, Y. (2000). Scientific revolutions and conceptual change: Results of a microgenetic process study. ICCE/ICCAI Eighth International Conference on Computers in Education/International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, Taipei, 165-172.
  36. Strike, K. & Posner, G. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L.H.T. West& A.L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. NY: Academic Press, 211-231.
  37. Trowbridge, D. & McDermott, L. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. The American Journal of Physics, 48, 1020-1028.
  38. Trowbridge, D. & McDermott, L. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. The American Journal of Physics, 49, 242-253.
  39. Voska, K. & Heikkinen, H. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 160–176.
  40. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds. And Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  41. Westbrook, R.B. (1993). John Dewey. Prospects: The quarterly review of comparative education, 23(12), 277-291.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References