You are here:

What Research Says About MOOCs – An Explorative Content Analysis
ARTICLE

, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg ; , Anadolu University ; , , King Saud University

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 1, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

Since the first offering of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in 2008, the body of literature on this new phenomenon of open learning has grown tremendously. In this regard, this article intends to identify and map patterns in research on MOOCs by reviewing 362 empirical articles published in peer-reviewed journals from 2008 to 2015. For the purposes of this study, a text-mining tool was used to analyse the content of the published research journal articles and to reveal the major themes and concepts covered in the publications. The findings reveal that the MOOC literature generally focuses on four lines of research: (a) the potential and challenges of MOOCs for universities; (b) MOOC platforms; (c) learners and content in MOOCs; and (d) the quality of MOOCs and instructional design issues. Prospective researchers may use these results to gain an overview of this emerging field, as well as to explore potential research directions.

Citation

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U. & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What Research Says About MOOCs – An Explorative Content Analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 8, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adham, R.S., & Lundqvist, K.O. (2015). MOOCs as a method of distance education in the Arab world– A review paper. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 123–139.
  2. Bartolomé-Pina, A.R., & Steffens, K. (2015). Are MOOCs promising learning environments? Communicar, 22(44), 91–99.
  3. Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in massive open
  4. Bulfin, S., Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2014). Making MOOCs: The construction of a new digital
  5. Chen, Y. (2014). Investigating MOOCs through blog mining. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 85–106. Https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1695
  6. Clinnin, K. (2014). Redefining the MOOC: Examining the multilingual and community potential of
  7. Conole, G. (2015). Designing effective MOOCs. Educational Media International, 52(4), 239–252.
  8. Cretchley, J., Rooney, D., & Galois, C. (2010). Mapping a 40-Year history with leximancer: Themes
  9. Daniel, J. (1998). Can you get my hard nose in focus? Universities, mass education and appropriate technology. In M. Eisenstadt& T. Vincent (Eds.), The knowledge web-learning and collaborating on the net (pp. 21–29). London: Kogan Page.
  10. Daza, V., Makriyannis, N., & Rovira Riera, C. (2013). MOOC attack: Closing the gap between preuniversity and university mathematics. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 28(3), 227–238. Https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.872558
  11. Deimann, M. (2015). The dark side of the MOOC: A critical inquiry on their claims and realities. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 2(1), 3.
  12. Diaz, V., Brown, M., & Pelletier, S. (2013). Learning and the massive open online course: A report on the ELI focus session [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3029.pdf
  13. Dodson, M.N., Kitburi, K., & Berge, Z.L. (2015). Possibilities for MOOCs incorporate training and development. Performance Improvement, 54(10), 14–21.
  14. Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks [PDF file]. National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf
  15. Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open
  16. Hew, K.F., & Cheung, W.S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.
  17. Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Siemens, G., & Hatala, M. (2015). What public media
  18. Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 255
  19. Mahraj, K. (2012). Using information expertise to enhance massive open online courses. Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 359–368. Https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2012.730415
  20. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers& Education, 80, 77–83.
  21. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., Kalman, H.K., & Kemp, J.E. (2011). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  22. Mune, C. (2015). Massive open online librarianship: Emerging practices in response to MOOCs. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1-2), 89–100.
  23. Ossiannilsson, E., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2016). Analysis of MOOCs practices from the perspective of learner experiences and quality culture. Educational Media International, 52(4), 272–283.
  24. Raffaghelli, J., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015). Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus. British Journal of Educational Technologies, 46(3), 488–509.
  25. Roberts, G., Waite, M., Lovegrove, E.J., & Mackness, J. (2013). X v c: Hybridity in through and about MOOCs. In Creating a virtuous circle: Proceedings of OER13. Milton Keynes: The Open University, Support Centre for Open Resources in Education. Retrieved from https://www.medev.ac.uk/oer13/file/79/9/
  26. Rocio, V., Coelho, J., Caeiro, S., Nicolau, P., & Teixeira, A. (2015). IMOOC on climate change:
  27. Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57–69. Retrieved from http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/17513228/JOLT_published.pdf
  28. Ruth, S. (2012). Can MOOCs and existing e-learning efficiency paradigms help reduce college costs? SSRN Electronic Journal.
  29. Sa’don, N.F., Alias, R.A., & Ohshima, N. (2014). Nascent research trends in MOOCs in higher
  30. Saadatdoost, R., Sim, A.T.H., Jafarkarimi, H., & Mei Hee, J. (2015). Exploring MOOC from education and Information Systems perspectives: A short literature review. Educational Review, 67(4), 505–518.
  31. Sangrà, A., González-Sanmamed, M., & Anderson, T. (2015). Meta-analysis of the research about MOOCs during 2013-2014. Educación XX1, 18(2), 1–28.
  32. Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC
  33. Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198–221. Https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
  34. Waite, M., Mackness, J., Roberts, G., & Lovegrove, E. (2013). Liminal participants and skilled
  35. Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. Ubiquity Press. Retrieved from http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=533876
  36. Yang, Q. (2014). Students’ motivation in asynchronous online discussions with MOOC mode. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 325–330.
  37. Zutshi, S., O’Hare, S., & Rodafinos, A. (2013). Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 218–227.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links

Also Read

Related Collections