You are here:

MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data
ARTICLE

,

IRRODL Volume 16, Number 6, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

MOOCs have shaped the discussion on learning with digital media for the last few years. One claim of MOOCs in the tradition of Open Educational Resources is to expand access to education, mainly in the field of higher education. But do MOOCs meet this claim? The empirical data in this article confirm the suspicion that, despite all the heterogeneity of the participants, MOOCs are mostly used by people with a higher level of education. Data of participants from two MOOCs from Germany, as well as, empirical data from large providers and universities are used. But due to the different forms of MOOCs there is no comprehensive proof possible. With respect to the Knowledge Gap Theory and the Digital Divide, a theoretical framework is provided to explain possible causes of a different usage. The aim of the article is to point out the risks of an increase of inequalities as a consequence of hyping MOOCs and to stimulate a discussion about possible answers to make MOOCs an instrument of education for all.

Citation

Rohs, M. & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 10, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Agarwal, A. (2013, June 15). Online universities: It’s time for teachers to join the revolution. The Observer. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/jun/15/university-education-online-mooc
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and Ideology in Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., de Boer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., & Seaton, D.T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Research and Practice in Assessment, 8, (pp. 13-25). Retrieved from
  4. Eichmann, H. (2000). Medienlebensstile zwischen Informationselite und Unterhaltungsproletariat: Wissensungleichheiten durch die differentielle Nutzung von Printmedien, Fernsehen, Computer und Internet. Frankfurt: New York; P. Lang.
  5. Ho, A.D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D.T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2381263_code1852476.pdf?abstract Id=2381263&mirid=1
  6. Kanani, R. (2014, June 21). EdX CEO Anant Agarwal on the Future of Online Learning. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/rahimkanani/2014/06/21/edx-ceo-anantagarwal-on-the-future-of-online-learning/
  7. Klobas, J.E., Mackintosh, B. & Murphy, J. (2015). The Anatomy of MOOCS. In P. Kim (Ed.), Massive Open Online Courses. The MOOC Revolution. New York& London: Routledge.
  8. Knox, J. (2013). Five critiques of the open educational resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 821–832. Doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.774354MOOCs and the Claim of Education for All: A Disillusion by Empirical Data Rohs and Ganz
  9. Lane, A. (2013). The potential of MOOCs to widen access to, and suc-cess in, higher education study. Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference 2013. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/38881/1/Andy%20Lane%20EADTU%202013%20paper.pdf Leven, I,. Bilger, F., Strauß, A., & Hartmann, J. (2013). Weiterbildungstrends in verschiedenen Bevölkerungsgruppen. In F. Bilger, D. Gnahs, J. Hartmann& H. Kuper (Hrsg.),
  10. Marshall, S. (2014). Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 250–262. Doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.917706
  11. Martin, A. & Langemeyer, I. (2014). Demografie, sozioökonomischer Status und Stand der Professionalisierung – das Personal in der Weiterbildung im Vergleich. In Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung (Hrsg.), Trends der Weiterbildung: DIE-Trendanalyse 2014 (pp. 43-67). Bielefeld. W. Bertelsmann.
  12. Statistisches Bundesamt (2012). Mikrozensus. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/BildungForschungKultur/Bildungsstand/Tabellen/Bildungsabschluss.html
  13. Perna, L., Ruby, A., Boruch, R., Wang, N., Scull, J., Evans, C. & Ahmad, S. (2013). The lifecycle of a million MOOC users. Retrieved from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pdf/ahead/perna_ruby_boruch_moocs_dec2013.pdf
  14. Richter, T. & McPherson, M. (2012). Open educational resources: Education for the world? Distance Education, 33(2), 201–219. Doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.692068
  15. TNS Infratest Sozialforschung. (2013). (N)onliner atlas. Retrieved from http://www.initiatived21.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/digitalindex.pdf
  16. Willems, J., & Bossu, C. (2012). Equity considerations for open educational resources in the globalization of education. Distance Education, 33(2), 185–199.
  17. Van Dijk, J. (2012). The evolution of the digital divide: The digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In J. Bus, M. Crompton& M. Hildebrandt (Eds.), Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2012 (S. 57–75). Lansdale, PA: IOS Press
  18. Viswanath, K. And Finnegan JR. (1996). The knowledge gap hypothesis: Twenty five years later. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 19 (pp. 187-227), Thousand Oaks: Sage
  19. Yuan, Li, Powell, Stephen. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education white paper. University of Bolton: CETIS, P.6 Retrieved from
  20. Zillien, N. (2009). Digitale ungleichheit: Neue technologien und alte ungleichheiten in der informations und wissensgesellschaft. (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden: Springer-VS. MOOCs and the Claim of Education for All: A Disillusion by Empirical Data Rohs and Ganz

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links