Assessment of the effectiveness of internet-based distance learning through the VClass e-Education platform
ARTICLE
Chadchadaporn Pukkaew, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Chiang Mai Campus
IRRODL Volume 14, Number 4, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Abstract
This study assesses the effectiveness of internet-based distance learning (IBDL) through the VClass live e-education platform. The research examines (1) the effectiveness of IBDL for regular and distance students and (2) the distance students’ experience of VClass in the IBDL course entitled Computer Programming 1. The study employed the common definitions of evaluation to attain useful statistical results. The measurement instruments used were test scores and questionnaires. The sample consisted of 59 first-year undergraduate students, most of whom were studying computer information systems at Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna Chiang Mai in Thailand. The results revealed that distance students engaged in learning behavior only occasionally but that the effectiveness of learning was the same for distance and regular students. Moreover, the provided computer-mediated communications (CMC) (e.g., live chat, email, and discussion board) were sparingly used, primarily by male distance students. Distance students, regular students, the instructor, and the tutor agreed to use a social networking site, Facebook, rather than the provided CMC during the course. The evaluation results produce useful information that is applicable for developing and improving IBDL practices.
Citation
Pukkaew, C. (2013). Assessment of the effectiveness of internet-based distance learning through the VClass e-Education platform. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved August 7, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171311/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Abraham, T. (2002). Evaluating the virtual management information systems classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13(2), 125-134.
- Baker, R.K. (2003). A framework for design and evaluation of internet-based distance learning courses phase one-framework justification, design and evaluation. Online Journal of Distance Learning, 6(2).
- Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T., & Madaus, G.F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
- Ferguson, L., & Wijekumar, K. (2000). Effective design and use of web-based distance learning environments. Professional Safety, 45(12), 28-32.
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Hallinger, P., & Kantamara, P. (2000). Educational change in Thailand: Opening a window onto leadership as a cultural process. School Leadership and Management, 189-205.
- Hornby, A.S. (1995). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English (5th ed.). (J. Crowther, K. Kavanagh, & M. Ashby, Eds.). England: Oxford University Press.
- Huitt, B., Hummel, J., & Kaeck, D. (2001). Assessment, measurement, evaluation, and research. Retrieved from edpsycinteractive.org Website: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.html
- Koch, J.V., & McAdory, A.R. (2012). Still no significant difference? The impact of distance learning on student success in undergraduate managerial economics. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 11(1), 27.
- Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
- Levine, S.J. (2005). Evaluation in distance education. Retrieved from LearnerAssociates.net Website: http://www.learnerassociates.net/debook/evaluate.pdf
- Martin, F., Parker, M.A., & Deale, D.F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3).
- Nguyen, T. (2008). Thailand: Cultural background for ESL/EFL teachers. Retrieved from http://www.hmongstudies.org/ThaiCulture.pdf
- Pagram, P., & Pagram, J. (2006). Issue in e-learning: A Thai case study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26(6), 1-8.
- Passerini, K., & Granger, M.J. (2000, January). A developmental model for distance learning using the Internet. Computers& Education, 34(1), 1-15.
- Pongvichai, S. (2011). Data analysis in statistics with computer: Emphasis on research. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University.
- Punpinij, S. (2010). Research techniques in social science. Bangkok: Witthayaphat.
- Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. In D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 438–456). New York: Macmillan.
- Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-20.
- Sims, R., Dobbs, G., & Hand, T. (2002). Enhancing quality in online learning: Scaffolding planning and design through proactive evaluation. Distance Education, 23(2), 135-148.
- Smith, P.L., & Dillon, C.L. (1999). Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 6-23.
- Thomas, H.F., Simmons, R.J., Jin, G., Almeda, A.A., & Mannos, A.A. (2005). Comparison of student outcomes for a classroom-based vs. An internet-based construction safety course. The American Society of Safety Engineers, 2(1).
- Trochim, W.M. (2006, October 20). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Retrieved from The Research Methods Knowledge Base website: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/
- Wasserman, J.D., & Bracken, B.A. (2003). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures. In I.B. Weiner, J.R. Graham& J.A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References