Seamless Support: Technology Enhanced Learning in Open Distance Learning at NWU
ARTICLE
Hennie Esterhuizen
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Volume 14, Number 3, ISSN 1303-6521
Abstract
Frantic attempts of investing in technology to demonstrate willingness to educate for the knowledge society may result in failure to address the real requirements. This paper presents the main features of a framework for integrating Technology Enhanced Learning in Open Distance Learning at North-West University, South Africa. Support towards building trust to attempt using technology, exposure to technology and promoting accomplishment is presented as a focus in the framework. Large numbers of practising teachers improving their qualifications through distance learning are not yet using electronic learning technologies. To overcome the digital divide in developing contexts requires responsible planning, commitment and empowerment on the part of university management in conjunction with pre-emptive support in response to changing people-centred requirements through continuous feedback. The one-sided nature of top-down interventions on the part of the university contrasts with necessary unobtrusive pre-emptive support as a result of requirements identified through bottom-up feedback. The framework emerged from an adapted design-based research approach of design cycles to identify aspects to include in the framework on how to address a satisfactory attempt. Support to enable living and learning using technology is required to shift teacher-students and faculty with declared intentions to use technology to progress towards adoption.
Citation
Esterhuizen, H. (2015). Seamless Support: Technology Enhanced Learning in Open Distance Learning at NWU. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 120-137. Retrieved August 6, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/161460/.
![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/eric.png)
ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
Keywords
- classification
- College Faculty
- computer literacy
- distance education
- Educational Administration
- Educational Planning
- electronic learning
- faculty development
- Feedback (Response)
- Foreign Countries
- Intervention
- open universities
- Social Change
- student teachers
- Teacher Qualifications
- technology integration
- Trust (Psychology)
References
View References & Citations Map- Aguti, J.N., Banks, F., Downes, T., & Henderikx, P. (2010). An international evaluation of the SCTE distance education provision. Potchefstroom: North-West University.
- Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
- Argyris, C. (1976). Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363-375.
- Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
- Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
- Beller, M., & Or, E. (1998). The Crossroads between Lifelong Learning and Information Technology: A Challenge Facing Leading Universities. Journal, 4(2). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue2/beller.html
- Blignaut, S., & Trollip, S.R. (2003). Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments--an exploratory investigation. [doi: DOI:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00033-2].Computers& Education, 41(2), 149-172.
- Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. [doi: DOI:10.1016/J.compedu.2007.09.017].Computers& Education, 50(2), 475-490.
- Butcher, N., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (2008). Technology and open learning: the potential of open education resources for K-12 education. In J. Voogt& G. Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 725-745). New York: Springer.
- Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35:, 982-1003.
- Davis, R., & Wong, D. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring the optimal experience of the eLearning environment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 97-126.
- Esterhuizen, H.D., Blignaut, A.S., & Ellis, S.M. (2012). Looking out and looking in: Exploring a case of faculty perceptions during e-learning staff development.
- Esterhuizen, H.D., Blignaut, A.S., Ellis, S.M., & Els, C.J. (2012). ODL students' perceived computer literacy competencies, expectations of suppport, intention to use and perseverance. Journal, 14(3). Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde49/articles/article_5.htm
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Available from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
- Garrison, D.R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Ascynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61-72.
- Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007
- Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Educational technology: the influence of theory. Journal, (6). Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2002/6
- Jung, C.G. (1990). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (Vol. 10th, Part I, Bollingen Series XX). New York: Princeton University Press.
- Lin, K.-M. (2011). E-Learning continuance intention: moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Computers& Education, 56(2), 515-526.
- Longworth, N., & Davies, W.K. (1996). Lifelong learning: new vision, new implications, new roles for people, organizations, nations and communities in the 21st century. London: Kogan Page.
- Maxcy, S.J. (2003). Pragmatic Threads in Mixed Methods Research in the Social Sciences: The Search for Multiple Modes of Inquiry and the End of the Philosophy of Formalism. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51-90). Thousand Oaks: Sage
- Müller, J. (2011). Gendering 'the Millennials'. Analysing staff responses to new student profiles in Spanish ICT higher education. Journal, 3(2). Retrieved from http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/170/342
- Mutula, S.M. (2008). Digital divide and economic development: case study of sub-Saharan Africa. The Electronic Library, 26(4), 468-489.
- Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty and the Internet world-wide. Cambridge. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
- Oblinger, D.G., & Oblinger, J.L. (2005). Educating the Net Generation, Available from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
- OECD. (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade. Technology and educational performance in PISA. Paris: OECD.
- Peirce, C.S. (1966). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Pelgrum, W.J. (2008). School practices and conditions for pedagogy and ICT. In N. Law, W.J. Pelgrum & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 67-121). Hong Kong: Springer and the Comparative Education Research Centre, The
- Sánchez, J., Salinas, A., Contreras, D., & Meyer, E. (2010). Does the new digital generation of learners exist? A qualitative study. Journal. Retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgibin/fulltext/123340848/PDFSTART.
- Scanlon, E. (2010). Technology enhanced learning in science: interactions, affordances and design based research. Journal, (8). Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/2010/08
- Schneckenberg, D., Ehlers, U., & Adelsberger, H. (2011). Web 2.0 and competence-oriented design of learning—potentials and implications for higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 42 No 5 2011, 42(5), 747-762.
- Schwier, R.A. (2010). Focusing Educational Technology Research on Informal Learning Environments. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 90-92.
- Taylor, J.C. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. Paper presented at the ICDE 20th World Conference. Retrieved 23 July 2011, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.113.3781&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- UNESCO. (2002). Information and communication technologies in teacher education: a planning guide (No. ED/HED/TED/3): UNESCO.
- Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introduction to educational design research. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney& N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 1-8). London: Routledge.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5).
- White, D. (2009). Digital literacy and ICT competence. Retrieved 25 August, 2010, from http://www.e-skillsilb.org/docs/DW_on_e-skills_for_Baltic_ICT_forum_090329.pdf
- World Bank. (2012). South Africa economic update: Focus on inequality of opportunity. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Copyright© The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References