You are here:

El estudiante en la educacin superior: Usos acadmicos y sociales de la tecnologa digital
ARTICLE

, , Rovira i Virgili University ; , Commonwealth of Learning

RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal Volume 12, Number 1, ISSN 1698-580X Publisher: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, University of New England

Full Text

Abstract

Este artculo presenta los resultados de una entrevista en profundidad realizada a veinte estudiantes de Educacin de una universidad presencial pblica de Catalua sobre cmo utilizan las tecnologas digitales en el aspecto social y acadmico. Esta investigacin demuestra que, si bien los estudiantes tienen un cierto nivel de habilidades en tecnologas digitales, cmo las utilizan vara en funcin del propsito que ellos les dan o segn una tarea determinada. Los resultados expuestos evidencian que las redes sociales y el WhatsApp son las aplicaciones ms importantes para los estudiantes porque les permiten ponerse en contacto con otros, comunicarse a pesar de las distancias y estar en contacto con personas con intereses comunes.

Citation

Gallardo Echenique, E., Marqus Molas, L. & Bullen, M. (2015). El estudiante en la educacin superior: Usos acadmicos y sociales de la tecnologa digital. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 25-37. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, University of New England. Retrieved August 12, 2024 from .

© 2015 Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, University of New England

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abbott, C. (2007). E-inclusion: Learning difficulties and digital technologies (Report 15). Bristol, RU. Accessed at http://archive.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/literature-reviews/Literature-Review314 Ahuvia, A. (2000). Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: Improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. Social Indicators Research, 54(2), 139–172.
  2. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
  3. Beurer-Zuellig, B., & Meckel, M. (2008). Smartphones enabling mobile collaboration. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) (pp. 49–59). Waikoloa, HI. Doi: 10.1109/
  4. Boase, J. (2013). Implications of software-based mobile media for social research. Mobile Media& Communication, 1(1), 57–62.
  5. Brady, K.P., Holcomb, L.B., & Smith, B.V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 151–170.
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  7. Brown, J.S. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11–20.
  8. Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital Learners in Higher Education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1–24.
  9. Bullen, M., Morgan, T., Belfer, K., & Qayyum, A.A. (2008). The Digital Learner at BCIT and implications for an e-Strategy. Paper presented at the Research Workshop of the European Distance Education Network (EDEN), Researching and
  10. Clough, G., Jones, A.C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359–371. Doi:10.1111/J.1365-2729.2007.00268.x
  11. Collins, K.M.T., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Jiao, Q.G. (2006). Prevalence of mixed-methods sampling designs in Social Science research. Evaluation& Research in Education, 19(2), 83–101.
  12. Corrin, L., Lockyer, L., & Bennett, S. (2010). Technological diversity: An investigation of students’ technology use in everyday life and academic study. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(4), 387–401. Doi:10.1080/17439884.2010.531024
  13. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London; New York: Routledge.
  14. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  15. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  16. Daly, K.J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies& Human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  17. Ferguson, D.L. (1993). Something a little out of the ordinary: Reflections on becoming an interpretivist researcher in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 14(4), 35–43.
  18. Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisis de datos cualitativos en Investigación Cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
  19. González, A. (2003). Los paradigmas de investigación en las ciencias sociales. ISLAS, 45(138), 125–135.
  20. Hague, C., & Williamson, B. (2009). Digital participation, digital literacy and school subjects: A review of the policies, literature and evidence (P. 30). Bristol, RU. Accessed at http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/Lit_reviews/DigitalParticipation.pdf
  21. Helsper, E.J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. Doi:10.1080/01411920902989227
  22. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1991). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage Original.
  23. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332–343.
  24. Kim, S. (2003). Research paradigms in organizational learning and performance: Competing modes of inquiry. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21(1), 9–18.
  25. Kirschner, P.A., & Karpinski, A.C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245.
  26. Krause, M. (1995). La investigación cualitativa: un campo de posibilidades y desafíos. Revista Temas de Educación, (7), 19–36.
  27. Pedró, F. (2009). New Millennium learners in higher education: Evidence and policy implications. Paper presented at The International Conference on 21st Century Competencies, Brussels: OECD/CERI.
  28. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
  29. Rapetti, E., & Cantoni, L. (2010). “Digital Natives” and learning with the ICTs. The “GenY @ work” research in Ticino, Switzerland. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(1), 39–49.
  30. Rapetti, E. (2012). LoDE: Learners of Digital Era (Doctoral dissertation). Università della Svizzera italiana. Accessed at: RERO DOC: Library Network of Western Switzerland (2012COM006).
  31. Romero, M., Guitert, M., Bullen, M., & Morgan, T. (2011). Learning in digital: An approach to digital learners in the UOC scenario [Special issue]. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1–8. Accessed at http://www.eurodl.org/?article=440
  32. Romero, M., Guitert, M., Sangrà, A., & Bullen, M. (2013). Do UOC students fit in the Net generation profile? An approach to their habits in ICT use. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 158–181. Accessed at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1422/2529 Smith, B.V. (2009). Use of online educational social networking in a school environment (Master’s thesis). North Carolina State University. Accessed at: NC State Theses and Dissertations, http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/900
  33. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  34. Thirunarayanan, M.O., Lezcano, H., McKee, M., & Roque, G. (2011). “Digital nerds” and “Digital normals”: Not “Digital natives” and “Digital immigrants”. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(2). Accessed at http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Feb_11/article03.htm
  35. Wang, Q., Woo, H.L., Quek, C.L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438.
  36. Willis, J.W. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches (P. 392). Thousand Oaks, CA:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links